Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 41 to 57 of 57

Thread: The Strong Form Thread - Flat 2022

  1. #41
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    To be honest, bj, it's almost embarrassing to take credit for it.

    Maybe if it had won by five lengths (or at 20/1)...

    But thanks anyway.

    (Not that I was tipping it - just following through on the original post.)
    Last edited by Desert Orchid; 31st May 2022 at 8:19 PM.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  2. #42
    Senior Member barjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    3,406
    Thanks
    999
    Thanked 1,224 Times in 927 Posts
    Blog Entries
    161
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    To be honest, bj, it's almost embarrassing to take credit for it.

    Maybe if it had won by five lengths (or at 20/1)...

    But thanks anyway.

    (Not that I was tipping it - just following through on the original post.)

    According to RP she ran the best comparative time of the meeting and at 6lb higher that was a pretty good performance which supports your original post. So credit is due, whether you like it or not

  3. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to barjon For This Useful Post:

    Colin Phillips (1st June 2022), Desert Orchid (1st June 2022)

  4. #43
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    [Raydoun] Engaged tomorrow. 6.05 Ripon, 6/1.
    Not looking good. Out to 9/1 in a place.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  5. #44
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    Not looking good. Out to 9/1 in a place.
    Came back in to 6s through the day but I've only just seen the replay. Not off the proverbial. Found more arses than Galileo in a covering season and finished full of running.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  6. #45
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    East Midlands
    Posts
    985
    Thanks
    418
    Thanked 482 Times in 357 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    Came back in to 6s through the day but I've only just seen the replay. Not off the proverbial. Found more arses than Galileo in a covering season and finished full of running.
    On the plus side, still looking good overall. I think PM might have been done by the ground. Looked soft enough to me, softer than Haydock, anyway..

    PS "Found more arses than Galileo in a covering season" Always good to go to bed chuckling :-)

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to chaumi For This Useful Post:

    Desert Orchid (1st June 2022)

  8. #46
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    In the Oaks, I’m on Concert Hall at 14/1, my only surviving ante-post bet. Yesterday evening I spent a lot of time checking the Godolphin filly’s time rating and it stands up next to the other good races on that card, including Cachet's 1000G win, and would maybe qualify for this thread but there were other lower-class races that were made to look extraordinarily fast for the their level so I have to distrust those time ratings. Still, Godolphin wouldn’t run this filly if they didn’t like her. If she goes and wins I'll put up the lower-level races later on that card which worked out very fast.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  9. #47
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2012
    Location
    East Midlands
    Posts
    985
    Thanks
    418
    Thanked 482 Times in 357 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    I think I've come across another strong race:

    York May 21, 4.42 (Race Ref #3117)

    On a day of seemingly true-run races (bar the fillies' G2 which was very slow), this race is working out fastest relative to its class.

    The first two have gone clear and are worth special note but I wouldn't be at all surprised if the beaten horses also franked the form. A Godolphin was third and I also noticed one that Euro had mentioned, Bullet Force, could only manage fourth. It's possible he has run as well as Euro might have hoped, only to have been beaten by especially unexposed types.

    Time will tell but the sectionals aren't up yet.

    The first two, Exminster and Golden Voice have gone into my tracker.
    On the basis of this, Master Richard looked somewhat of a good bet in the 6.06 Doncaster, confidence enhanced by Ann D being on a treble. He had it a furlong out, but fair play to the eventual winner (by an inch!!), she fought back bravely after looking beat (although MR jockey looked a little unbalanced for a second, maybe this is what cost the win).

    I guess - given this was a Class 5 - you can't exactly say it franked the form, but probably didn't do it any harm.

  10. The Following User Says Thank You to chaumi For This Useful Post:

    Desert Orchid (3rd June 2022)

  11. #48
    Senior Member barjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    3,406
    Thanks
    999
    Thanked 1,224 Times in 927 Posts
    Blog Entries
    161
    Desert

    Wonder if you’d take a look at the 4:51 Doncaster today. Looked a pretty hot race for a Class 5 Novice to me.

  12. #49
    Senior Member barjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    3,406
    Thanks
    999
    Thanked 1,224 Times in 927 Posts
    Blog Entries
    161
    Desert

    Wonder if you’d take a look at the 4:51 Doncaster today. Looked a pretty hot race for a Class 5 Novice to me.

  13. #50
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    Might be Wed/Thu before I get round to it, Bj, but I'll try.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  14. The Following User Says Thank You to Desert Orchid For This Useful Post:

    barjon (4th June 2022)

  15. #51
    Senior Member Euronymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Leyland
    Posts
    18,879
    Thanks
    340
    Thanked 837 Times in 695 Posts
    https://www.racingpost.com/results/2...2-05-20/810103

    This looks really strong form. I tracked Spinaround from it and he won at Chelmsford next start. Since:

    Nuvolari wasn't great at Epsom but a lot of horses just don't act there
    Wodeton ran well against Outgate and Thunder Legend at Chester this past Saturday
    Ascending won well at Goodwood on Friday. Needs cut but was impressive against older horses
    I'm tracking Rousay who was third even though I'm not a massive Hannon guy

    This was Lawful Command's second victory at Goodwood - the previous win he beat Wodeton again and the fourth that day was Zoom who ran well in the Israr race at Newbury. Zoom has since been second at Donny to a Stoute horse called Migdam who went straight in the tracker.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Euronymous For This Useful Post:

    Desert Orchid (13th June 2022)

  17. #52
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    That Sandringham must be sh1t hot form. Fresh Hope was clearly a Fellowes-Turner special and Gosden had said Crenelle would win the Pretty Polly but ultimately they were beaten by two fillies who overcame a week-long draw bias. The winner is clearly G3 at least.

    Edit - Thinking about it a bit more, I now wonder if Murtagh set a new trend last year with Create Belief who went on to win a G3. She had been a wide margin winner in the Sandringham. I suspect the Fellowes-Turner filly would be good enough to win an average past renewal but she has been pretty much smashed. I think next year we'll need to look for G3/G2 types getting in on a mark around 95-99.
    Last edited by Desert Orchid; 17th June 2022 at 5:37 PM.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  18. #53
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    Good thread even if most of you were talking through your hole,

  19. #54
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    Giving this thread another go on the basis of a race I've come across.

    Ascot Saturday, 5.20 (Raceform race reference #4911)

    The time of this race is making the rest of the card positively - or should that be negatively - pedestrian.

    If I allocate a going allowance that would enable the winner to run to its new OR of 84, then these are the time ratings the rest of the winners on the card have run to (with RPRs for the race in brackets):

    Defence Of Fort 55 (91)
    Bague D'Or 58 (99)
    Mountain Peak 81 (113)
    Chindit 50 (117)
    Wild Crusade 57 (104)
    Random Harvest 57 (95)

    Either the race in question was exceptionally fast or the other races have been exceptionally slow or the truth lies somewhere in between.

    The second scenario is highly unlikely so even a conservative application of the latter has to be a positive.Two of the three are fillies and maybe be open to further improvement at this time of year and going forward.

    All three have gone into my tracker.

    It was an all-age Class 4 handicap with two 3yos beating a 4yo, almost four lengths clear of the fourth.
    Last edited by Desert Orchid; 13th July 2022 at 8:31 PM.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  20. #55
    Senior Member barjon's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2020
    Posts
    3,406
    Thanks
    999
    Thanked 1,224 Times in 927 Posts
    Blog Entries
    161
    Course was watered and would have got faster and faster as the day wore on as it dried out?

  21. #56
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,735
    Thanks
    2,965
    Thanked 3,499 Times in 2,755 Posts
    Very likely but it's unusual for that kind of scenario to throw up this kind of difference.

    I'm giving the tracker horses three runs each although I'll be slightly wary of the bounce if they reappear too soon.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  22. #57
    Senior Member Euronymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Leyland
    Posts
    18,879
    Thanks
    340
    Thanked 837 Times in 695 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Euronymous View Post

    This was Lawful Command's second victory at Goodwood - the previous win he beat Wodeton again and the fourth that day was Zoom who ran well in the Israr race at Newbury. Zoom has since been second at Donny to a Stoute horse called Migdam who went straight in the tracker.
    Migdam run from Doncaster below. The third, Adjourn, was very taking winning a similar race also at Doncaster last Saturday. Migdam is in the opener next Wednesday at Goodwood. Ryan Moore booked.
    https://www.racingpost.com/results/1...2-06-04/811433
    Last edited by Euronymous; 22nd July 2022 at 11:44 AM.

  23. The Following User Says Thank You to Euronymous For This Useful Post:

    Desert Orchid (22nd July 2022)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •