Page 12 of 12 FirstFirst ... 2789101112
Results 221 to 235 of 235

Thread: Royal Ascot 2021

  1. #221
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by reet hard View Post
    Doesn't matter whether handicaps or pattern races, it provides a plethora of quality form going forward, much of it useful till the end of the season, and beyond.
    Ascot this year reminded me of every day being a Thursday at Cheltenham if you lost the first two days. Low on confidence and trying to solve wicked races.

  2. The Following User Says Thank You to Slim For This Useful Post:

    Tout Seul (20th June 2021)

  3. #222
    Senior Member Tout Seul's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    2,623
    Thanks
    323
    Thanked 299 Times in 206 Posts
    I normally have a sizeable AP book going into Ascot every year. Alcohol Free was my only AP bet this year and that was to a far smaller stake than I would normally have at the meeting on my main fancy.
    Questions as to which race she would be in and whether she could turn around from a not impressive run in the Guineas against against a decent field curtailed my enthusiasm. I missed the race live as was travelling to Oxford on the motorway in an horrendous storm which prevented any signal getting through.
    In the race she put a pretty good performance showing both speed and stamina with Murphy seemingly quite confident. She is to be considered for the July Cup and the Sussex Stakes and i have no clue where her best chance would be.

    Overall I feel Slim's comment above is an apt description. One horse I would take from the meeting is Berkshire Shadow.

    POSTED IN APRIL.
    I have kept an eye open for Jeff Smith's horses since the early 80"s when whilst putting together a financing package that helped his business win a significant export order I was recommended to follow his then untried 2yo, Chief Singer. The horse became the first flat horse that I followed throughout his career, travelling to see the beautiful beast run whenever possible. The same with the admirable Persian Punch.
    Last September I put up his Foxtrot Lady as one to back when he put Dettori on the horse which duly won at 18/1.
    Using part of the proceeds I added AlcoholFree for the 1000 gns to my core Cheltenham AP multiples at 33/1. Unfortunately with NR's and Abacadabra's fall I have only one small stake double left with Minella Indo.
    At the same time I began backing AlcoholFree singly and have numerous small stakes bets at prices ranging from 44's to 10/1, several as the remainder of failed multiples.

    Realistically I am guessing as to whether she has developed over the winter and it will depend on her performance on Sunday in the Dubai Duty Free ( awful name for a race). Hoping not expecting though Balding's recent comments provide some encouragement.




  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Tout Seul For This Useful Post:

    edgt (21st June 2021)

  5. #223
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    884
    Thanks
    607
    Thanked 402 Times in 300 Posts
    I felt Alcohol Free was disappointing in the Guineas but was not downhearted. My feeling was she (and Saffron Beach for that matter) were always doing catch-up as what pace there was was on the far side. If Santa Barbara had been on the stands side it might have been a different race. I'd hope Alcohol Free will take in the Falmouth before taking in the mile race at Ascot.

    The enlargement of Ascot has not been a success to my eyes. Please go back to 6 races a day (I'd prefer 4 days and 7 really, but that's unlikely) and let's get rid of the Commonwealth Stakes. One used to know who was likely to be the best sprinter by the end of Ascot, not any more.

    Ascot is becoming like Cheltenham where the horses have choices so that they can dodge each other. Both meetings used to be championships, now they are often the crowning of mediocrity.

  6. The Following User Says Thank You to Eleanora Duse For This Useful Post:

    Desperate Dan (21st June 2021)

  7. #224
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    I dismissed Alcohol Free from my considerations on the basis of the trainer claiming before the Guineas that he didn't think she would get the trip (but had to try). I did wonder when they persevered with her at what would be a stiffer test but stuck with my original decision to dismiss her chances.

    She was a good winner of a modest race and congrats to all her backers. As I've said elsewhere I really like Balding as a trainer and will never begrudge him a good win.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  8. #225
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    North Cork. Home of steeple chasing
    Posts
    5,341
    Thanks
    2,209
    Thanked 1,335 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    Commonwealth Stakes an important race for three year old sprinters, whether it has to be Group 1 is another matter.
    Enlargement of Festivals :
    We live in an overkill society where nothing exceeds like excess.( Baffert/ Cheltenham / Godolphin/Ballydoyle/McManus/Gigginstown/WPM/Elliot etc)
    I do wish we come to our senses before racing becomes extinct by "necessity".

  9. #226
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    884
    Thanks
    607
    Thanked 402 Times in 300 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    I dismissed Alcohol Free from my considerations on the basis of the trainer claiming before the Guineas that he didn't think she would get the trip (but had to try). I did wonder when they persevered with her at what would be a stiffer test but stuck with my original decision to dismiss her chances.

    She was a good winner of a modest race and congrats to all her backers. As I've said elsewhere I really like Balding as a trainer and will never begrudge him a good win.
    She did beat two Guineas winners, maybe they're all modest too.

  10. #227
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Eleanora Duse View Post
    She did beat two Guineas winners, maybe they're all modest too.
    Yes. I believe I said it at the time. And I was on Mother Earth at Newmarket.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  11. #228
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2013
    Posts
    884
    Thanks
    607
    Thanked 402 Times in 300 Posts
    I share your admiration for A Balding. He's a much better trainer than his father, who was fairly good but whom I will forever admire for his selflessness over the Hern affair in 1998/9.

  12. #229
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    3,722
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 790 Times in 572 Posts
    Julian Muscat, Racing Post

    It goes down as the year when Royal Ascot followed other sporting institutions of similar status in putting quid before quality. Like the expanded Euro 2020, which finally reaches the last-16 stage this weekend more than two weeks after it started, Royal Ascot has become a meeting of two halves.

    The first half of each day resembles the Royal Ascot of old, when superior horses lock horns in a series of thrilling tussles. The second half can be charitably described as unfit for purpose. To borrow a revolting phrase so beloved of the toffs, it is mutton dressed as lamb.

    When an extra day was added in 2002 to celebrate the Queen's Golden Jubilee, it was strictly a one-off, Ascot assured us. Now extra races added last year under the cover of Covid have become fully incorporated. All of it gift-wrapped in a cloak of stealth.

    Never mind the quality, let's ensure those insatiable Hong Kong punters have an extra race each day on bet on. Let's hear those tills ringing with Ascot's slice of the action. And how dare anyone take issue with the concept of a world pool that brings money into the coffers of poor old beleaguered British racing.

    In the course of two decades 24 races have become 35 – and with no dilution in quality, we are told. Stop and think about that for a minute. How can it possibly be? Are there really 45 per cent more quality horses today than there were 20 years ago?

    But that's not how Ascot paints it. In its eyes the new handicaps are mirror images of existing handicaps but over different distances; ergo, there is no dilution in quality since they cater for different horses.

    There may not be dilution in quality to the existing handicaps but there is a significant dilution to the quality of horses at the meeting as a whole. That is what really matters.

    The inevitable consequence is that the last three races on each day are barely worth the time of day. No fewer than 12 of the 15 are handicaps, and virtually unfathomable ones at that. The five new handicaps threw up winners at odds of 13-2, 10-1, 12-1, 18-1 and 33-1. Is it any wonder the bookies warmly welcomed their introduction? Throw in the pronounced draw bias down the straight mile and bingo! Royal Ascot is Euro Millions in disguise.

    To be fair, Royal Ascot has resisted mind-numbing expansion longer than most. The Olympics will soon be upon us and the games will bring joy, because they always do. But how many of you will be watching some of the more recent sporting additions, among them Artistic Swimming, BMX Freestyle, Skateboarding, Surfing and Sport Climbing? I'll bet you can hardly wait.

    The stark reality of Royal Ascot's day of two halves has become more pronounced since ITV started broadcasting every race live at a time when most of us have been unable to attend for the last two years. The effect of watching the daily broadcast is to wonder whether this is a case of having too much of a good thing.

    The old adage holds that events are successful when they leave the audience wanting more on their conclusion. That's not how I personally felt at the close of each day. Those last three races dragged on; only hardened punters will have relished trying to decipher them.

    There is much to be said for the US Masters' policy of restricting live broadcasting, in the process retaining intrigue. It can be frustrating for golf aficionados but that's precisely the point. It leaves you wanting more.

    Intrigue and exclusivity are valuable commodities, especially in these oversaturated times. Some of the intrigue is dissolving, while oversaturation is stripping away layers of Royal Ascot's exclusivity. For trainers and jockeys, a first winner at the meeting was a greater milestone than it is today.

    I get the upsides: spreading out the jam, greater inclusivity and all that. But winning at Royal Ascot isn't meant to be easy. No fewer than nine jockeys rode their first winners last week. The idea that it was a huge dream realised became too repetitive to make much impact with television viewers.

    One further question thrown up by the day-of-two-halves theme is whether racing fans accustomed to the old quality diet are prepared to pay to watch four races before their interest tapers away. There is a potentially beneficial spin-off: those travelling by train and car may find the journey home less congested as people depart at various stages of the afternoon. But are you prepared to pay to watch just four races?

    The answer has to be in the affirmative. The best horses are still there. At no other meeting in Britain will you find the likes of Battaash, Love, Palace Pier, Poetic Flare, Stradivarius, Subjectivist and Wonderful Tonight all gathered in one place. But you'd pay the entry with a slightly heavy heart.

    Consider this as a lament, rather than a criticism. Five days and 35 races are here to stay, as are the financial benefits to Ascot racecourse in difficult times. But let's not hear all that guff about quality being unaffected. Royal Ascot of yore is gone, gone, gone. It will soon be forgotten.
    Last edited by wilsonl; 22nd June 2021 at 7:07 AM.
    Alcohol, because no good story ever started with "I was eating this salad..."

  13. The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to wilsonl For This Useful Post:

    Desperate Dan (22nd June 2021), edgt (22nd June 2021), Eleanora Duse (23rd June 2021), G-G (22nd June 2021), Slim (22nd June 2021)

  14. #230
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    I'm still marvelling at the Sandringham winner too. That was one of the most impressive winners of a major meeting handicap you'll ever see. They were strung out like 3-mile chasers and the near side finished 25 lengths ahead of the far side, far more than in any other straight-course handicap. A G2 performance at worst and who knows where her progression might take her.
    Create Belief up 13lbs.

    Runner-up Samoot only up 3lbs. Cert next time if kept to handicaps.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  15. The Following User Says Thank You to Desert Orchid For This Useful Post:

    Colin Phillips (22nd June 2021)

  16. #231
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    Rohaan has only been raised 4lbs for winning the Wokingham. I haven't seen a blog that might explain the handicapper's thinking but it strikes me as very lenient indeed, especially given the implication that the placed horses will have been raised less or not at all.

    I imagine the reasoning will be along the lines of the implications of going higher and how it might make Rohaan look compared with the principals in the Commonwealth Cup. That might be flawed thinking.

    I had placed horses Gulliver and Hey Jonesy very well handicapped on the pick of their form and they were off for their lives. King's Lynn was already officially 7lbs well in. Fresh was a +p horse and one I really feared but couldn't get involved with at close to favouritism. He has out-run my expectations of him.

    What I will say with some confidence is that Rohaan will eat alive any of the principals in the Commonwealth Cup off level weights, certainly in similar ground, and would give the top older 6f horses something serious to think about.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Desert Orchid For This Useful Post:

    Colin Phillips (22nd June 2021)

  18. #232
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    The handicapper has copped out knowing it won't run in a handicap again as you alluded to with not wanting to rate higher than the Commonwealth.

  19. #233
    Senior Member Euronymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Leyland
    Posts
    18,859
    Thanks
    336
    Thanked 833 Times in 691 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Slim View Post
    not wanting to rate higher than the Commonwealth.
    Or the Diamond Jubilee. The market for the July Cup is crazy wrong. They have the older horses - DOD, Oxted and Starman as 5s co's with the 3yos at 7s+

    The younger generation are much better imo. It's just narrowing down which one(s) to back.

  20. #234
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Euronymous View Post
    Or the Diamond Jubilee. The market for the July Cup is crazy wrong. They have the older horses - DOD, Oxted and Starman as 5s co's with the 3yos at 7s+

    The younger generation are much better imo. It's just narrowing down which one(s) to back.
    Could well be an angle there.

  21. #235
    Senior Member Frankel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    4,766
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 175 Times in 161 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Frankel View Post
    Go Bears Go
    Better.
    All comers, all grounds, all beaten!

    This perfect mix of poetry and destruction.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •