Page 1 of 4 1234 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 78

Thread: Zanahiyr

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    719
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 115 Times in 97 Posts

    Zanahiyr

    Anyone see this lad ending up in the Supreme ?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2016
    Posts
    2,594
    Thanks
    246
    Thanked 446 Times in 318 Posts
    Was clipped a week or so ago, but no sure if thats cause of NRNB.

    Exchange will tell you, but i would not at all be suprised.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,891
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked 318 Times in 204 Posts
    I think Elliot will want to win a chelt race for the Morans and will go for the easiest target. RTE panel, including Geraghty, who rides both him and Quilixios, very straightforward in saying the yard know the pecking order.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,730
    Thanks
    2,962
    Thanked 3,497 Times in 2,754 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by frontrunner View Post
    Anyone see this lad ending up in the Supreme ?
    I hope not. I'm in up to my cojones at 4/1 for the Triumph.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    3,723
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 792 Times in 573 Posts
    Elliott, when interviewed, said after Quilixios won that Zanahiyr was going straight to the Triumph and Quilixios probably would but nearly offered an alternative before catching himself
    Alcohol, because no good story ever started with "I was eating this salad..."

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    719
    Thanks
    35
    Thanked 115 Times in 97 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by wilsonl View Post
    Elliott, when interviewed, said after Quilixios won that Zanahiyr was going straight to the Triumph and Quilixios probably would but nearly offered an alternative before catching himself
    Interesting , I am convinced Quilixios was a marker for him today for future plans. Like DO it could cost me if he is switched.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    3,723
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 792 Times in 573 Posts
    I took 14/1 with Virgin the second he crossed the line on 29th Nov so I fecking hope so anyway
    Alcohol, because no good story ever started with "I was eating this salad..."

  8. #8
    Senior Member tiggers1972's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2013
    Location
    Cheltenham
    Posts
    3,694
    Thanks
    346
    Thanked 380 Times in 315 Posts
    Elliot seemed adamant that he's going Triumph.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2013
    Posts
    1,015
    Thanks
    442
    Thanked 301 Times in 243 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by tiggers1972 View Post
    Elliot seemed adamant that he's going Triumph.
    He was fairly blunt over who was the better as well.

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    Chance of him running in the Supreme 0%

  11. The Following User Says Thank You to Slim For This Useful Post:

    tiggers1972 (9th February 2021)

  12. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,753
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 935 Times in 582 Posts
    I disagree it's 0%.

    They have a line on Appreciate It from Sunday's course and distance runs now, and if Zanahiyr is better than Quilixios, then there's a reasonable case to be made that Zanahiyr can finish ahead of Appreciate It with the 7lb allowance.

    Following the logic through, Elliott beieves he has the best two juveniles in training and they'd finish 1-2 in the Triumph. There's no doubt the alternative of the Supreme will be discussed. They just have to. When discussing it, they'll also discuss Ballyadam chasing home Appreciate It's backside again. Ballyadam could also swtich to the Ballymore don't forget.

    With what is assumed targets currently Elliott has a 1-2 in the Triumph, and a place at best in the Supreme. However by switching Zanahiyr to the Supreme, and Ballyadam to the Ballymore, he has 3 potential winners and not 1.

    Whilst I agree it probably won't happen, I would certainly not rate it as 0%.

    As a precaution I did the Quilixios Triumph and Zanahiyr Supreme 47/1ew double before the weekend, and added a Ballyadam Ballymore 624/1ew treble after the weekend. All no runner no bet, so nothing to lose and bets to nothing just in case.

  13. #12
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,730
    Thanks
    2,962
    Thanked 3,497 Times in 2,754 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maruco View Post
    I disagree it's 0%.

    They have a line on Appreciate It from Sunday's course and distance runs now, and if Zanahiyr is better than Quilixios, then there's a reasonable case to be made that Zanahiyr can finish ahead of Appreciate It with the 7lb allowance.
    Please God, NO!!!!!
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  14. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    Surrey
    Posts
    3,723
    Thanks
    414
    Thanked 792 Times in 573 Posts
    I can see the logic but I presume you mean “if Zanahiyr is better than Ballyadam” rather than Quixilios, as there are no form lines to go on to even interpret that as meaning a 7lb allowance would allow Zanahiyr to master Appreciate It.

    And the bet isn’t quite a nothing to lose just because it’s NRNB as, if Quixilios goes Triumph and is beaten by Zanahiyr then it’s a loser despite the Zanahiyr part being a NR.

    Beaten by your own non runner would be hard to take
    Alcohol, because no good story ever started with "I was eating this salad..."

  15. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,753
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 935 Times in 582 Posts
    I did actually mean both Lee.

    They already have a line at home between Ballyadam and Zanahiyr, but they now have the comparative times and performances between Quilixios and Appreciate It from Sunday, and can make assumptions based on Appreciate It having to give Zanahiyr 7lbs based on both of those things. You'd think they can get a pretty reliable guide on where they are against Appreciate It and whether Zanahiyr could justify a Supreme entry.

    You're right about the nrnb part of course, but that wouldn't matter if I didn't believe Quilixios beats Zanahiyr on the stiff new course on the Friday. I already think Zanahiyr would be better suited by the old course on Tuesday whether he switches targets or not. Gordon has also said what 'type' each is, and based on his assessment of one being all speed and the other more a staying type he may draw the same conclusion as me.
    Last edited by Maruco; 9th February 2021 at 4:13 PM.

  16. The Following User Says Thank You to Maruco For This Useful Post:

    wilsonl (9th February 2021)

  17. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maruco View Post
    I disagree it's 0%.

    They have a line on Appreciate It from Sunday's course and distance runs now, and if Zanahiyr is better than Quilixios, then there's a reasonable case to be made that Zanahiyr can finish ahead of Appreciate It with the 7lb allowance.

    Following the logic through, Elliott beieves he has the best two juveniles in training and they'd finish 1-2 in the Triumph. There's no doubt the alternative of the Supreme will be discussed. They just have to. When discussing it, they'll also discuss Ballyadam chasing home Appreciate It's backside again. Ballyadam could also swtich to the Ballymore don't forget.

    With what is assumed targets currently Elliott has a 1-2 in the Triumph, and a place at best in the Supreme. However by switching Zanahiyr to the Supreme, and Ballyadam to the Ballymore, he has 3 potential winners and not 1.

    Whilst I agree it probably won't happen, I would certainly not rate it as 0%.

    As a precaution I did the Quilixios Triumph and Zanahiyr Supreme 47/1ew double before the weekend, and added a Ballyadam Ballymore 624/1ew treble after the weekend. All no runner no bet, so nothing to lose and bets to nothing just in case.
    It's 0%. I don't get these things wrong.

  18. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,753
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 935 Times in 582 Posts
    You do, but you might not get this one wrong!

  19. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maruco View Post
    You do, but you might not get this one wrong!
    Sometimes punters try to be too clever. See Escaria Ten Kim Muir. This theory reminds me of the Samcro 10/1 Supreme NRNB lads.

  20. The Following User Says Thank You to Slim For This Useful Post:

    littlelad (9th February 2021)

  21. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2019
    Posts
    2,597
    Thanks
    568
    Thanked 680 Times in 472 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Slim View Post
    Chance of him running in the Supreme 0%
    You can give me an example when I've been wrong too. I took some **** on here for the UDS (Arkle) - Vatour (Jewson) doube at 20/1. That was a proper related bet.

  22. The Following User Says Thank You to Slim For This Useful Post:

    littlelad (9th February 2021)

  23. #19
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,730
    Thanks
    2,962
    Thanked 3,497 Times in 2,754 Posts
    Interviewed the other day, Jack Kennedy seemed to be saying it had already been decided that he was riding Zanahiyr in the Triumph regardless.

    I got the impression Gordon Elliot sees Zanahiyr as a future Champion Hurdler. He did say he was more of 'speed horse' than Ballyadam ("more of a staying type in the future" or words to that effect).

    I wouldn't worry about the course. His Fairyhouse time was top class and he went easily all through the race, while he cruised clear off a modest pace last time. I think he just outclasses everything.

    He would probably win the Supreme but I wouldn't say it was because of the weight. It's just wfa, after all. He's just better than anything else.
    Last edited by Desert Orchid; 9th February 2021 at 5:12 PM.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  24. #20
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,730
    Thanks
    2,962
    Thanked 3,497 Times in 2,754 Posts
    A timely piece from Simon Rowlands over at ATR:

    https://www.attheraces.com/blogs/sec...triumph-hurdle

    For what it's worth, I reckon Zanahiyr is some way better than he rates it.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •