I'm wondering if now is a good time for a thread on Arkle.
He pops up in debates every so often and there's disagreement one way or another so even after more than 50 years he's still making racing of yesteryear relevant.
I've only one more full day of total isolation left - I'm still convinced whatever I've had hasn't been coronavirus - and have been watching some Youtube stuff about him.
One thing I noticed that I don't recall anyone else ever saying before was that Tom Dreaper "discovered" interval training. It was Arkle's work rider Paddy Woods who said it. He said Dreaper told him to go down to the bottom of the gallop and come up about four furlongs, trot back down, four furlongs, repeatedly.
Then ally that idea to what Michael Dickinson said recently in an interview about when he took over from his mother - so maybe 20 years on from Dreaper and a few years after Martin Pipe in the mid-70s - about having a sports scientist review his training routine. After it he asked the visitor for his opinion. The reply was along the lines of, 'Is that it? If that was an athlete he'd only be just warmed up. You need to work them a lot harder.'
So, is it possible that Arkle was a great horse but whose ability was exaggerated relative to his opponents by being harder fit in the same way that Pipe's and Dickinson's runners were?