Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 60

Thread: Pathetic and Petty Betfair !!

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,940
    Thanks
    403
    Thanked 240 Times in 175 Posts

    Pathetic and Petty Betfair !!

    Yesterday I had the rare satisfaction of having 20 quid on the Stewards Cup winner. My bet was on the Betfair Sportsbook platform and as it was an ITV televised race I fully expected to receive the usual £20 Sports Bonus as it`s SP was over 3/1. As it was never credited I queried it with them and was told as from a week ago I was excluded. Nothing sent to me notifying me of this and, as far as I could see, nothing on the website mentioning changes.

    What an appalling example of "customer service." I`m a low stakes punter who mainly bets on Saturdays and have been a Betfair customer for many years and have certainly not made much, if any, profits. Legally, they may be entitled to do this but ethically it`s appalling. They offer these incentives and then withdraw them at a whim and without notification. What a petty and pathetic outfit!!
    Last edited by Desperate Dan; 4th August 2019 at 1:06 PM.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    I bet fairly regularly with Betfair and have never even heard of this bonus. I notice they withdrew the free follow-up bet if backed a winner at 3/1+ some time back but don't know exactly when.

    I mentioned a similar issue I had with Betvictor some time back. They didn't give me the best odds and it turned out they had withdrawn the concession from me over a year before (which shows how infrequently I bet with them) and had informed be by email at the time. I had just forgotten. I zeroed my account and haven't bet with them since.

    Today I was in touch with William Hill because they didn't settle a winning bet yesterday at best odds. They said it was because I placed the bet on Friday evening and their BOG doesn't apply until the day of the race, a situation that has been in place since May. I make 95% of my bets via oddschecker and when I checked tomorrows betting, the BOG is ticked above the Hills logo. When I pointed this out to the operative he said it's Oddschecker's issue. I lost out twice in the race as not only did I miss out on the better price but I was also hit with a R4 due to a non-runner which came out much earlier in the day.

    I've asked for one of the managers to call me back but I won't hold my breath. If they stand their ground I'll probably just zero that account and look elsewhere. I'm more than halfway to quitting altogether anyway so it's no big deal.

    I'm not back, by the way. I'm just offering Dan, who is one of the proper gents on this forum, some moral support.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  3. The Following User Says Thank You to Desert Orchid For This Useful Post:

    Desperate Dan (4th August 2019)

  4. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,493
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
    It always amuses me slightly when I hear punters complaining about being stung by bookmakers and threatening to close their accounts in retaliation. The thing is, betting isn't quite the traditional consumer market where you can protest a company by withdrawing your custom. If you want to protest (and hurt) a bookmaker, you have to keep betting with them. Now in fairness Dan has stated that he has "not made much, if any profit". Fair play to him, he's admitted it, but I've seen plenty of people in cyberspace threatening to close accounts whilst claiming to be profitable. Never too sure about the consistency of the two positions myself

    I remember being done by Ladbrokes a decade or so ago and not betting with them for about a year, deciding to save up my next good bet and reserve it for them. As it transpires they gave me 20/1 about Reverence for the Nunthorpe with heavy rain forecast. It duly rained, the ground at York went heavy, Reverence won by 2L's and was returned something like 4/1. Yes, I'm sure Ladbrokes share price took a hammering that day because of me, and last time I checked they were still a successful FTSE what ever company, but I guess it's all about settling your own grievance, but bookmaking is an almost uniquely difficult industry to do it in due to the nature of the transaction and relationship between company and customer. The only way you can punish them is to beat them, unless you're a losing punter of course
    Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly. _ Harry Limes

  5. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,940
    Thanks
    403
    Thanked 240 Times in 175 Posts
    I`m not going to close my account but I`ll do the bulk of my betting elsewhere. Of course, if I see better value in their odds then I`ll use them. My gripe, though, is the way they`ve gone about removing the bonus. Reeks of poor management.

  6. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2003
    Location
    Talbot Green
    Posts
    13,268
    Thanks
    2,133
    Thanked 958 Times in 720 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Nice to have you back, DO. You have been missed.
    Ah! but a man's reach should exceed his grasp......

  7. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,940
    Thanks
    403
    Thanked 240 Times in 175 Posts
    I`ll echo that, Colin.

  8. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    8,252
    Thanks
    264
    Thanked 317 Times in 251 Posts
    First off I have to say it is every punters responsibility to be aware of a bookmakers terms and conditions -I haven't had a bet with William Hill since 2002 and I know they no longer pay double result.If I was you Dan I would have another word with customer services -I find it hard to believe they would exclude you without notice -ask them for a copy of the email.
    There is another possibility -recently I was put on a 2% commission deal with betfair -the downside was no more guaranteed prices or special offers -have you signed up for something like that recently.

  9. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    8,252
    Thanks
    264
    Thanked 317 Times in 251 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    I bet fairly regularly with Betfair and have never even heard of this bonus. I notice they withdrew the free follow-up bet if backed a winner at 3/1+ some time back but don't know exactly when.

    I mentioned a similar issue I had with Betvictor some time back. They didn't give me the best odds and it turned out they had withdrawn the concession from me over a year before (which shows how infrequently I bet with them) and had informed be by email at the time. I had just forgotten. I zeroed my account and haven't bet with them since.

    Today I was in touch with William Hill because they didn't settle a winning bet yesterday at best odds. They said it was because I placed the bet on Friday evening and their BOG doesn't apply until the day of the race, a situation that has been in place since May. I make 95% of my bets via oddschecker and when I checked tomorrows betting, the BOG is ticked above the Hills logo. When I pointed this out to the operative he said it's Oddschecker's issue. I lost out twice in the race as not only did I miss out on the better price but I was also hit with a R4 due to a non-runner which came out much earlier in the day.

    I've asked for one of the managers to call me back but I won't hold my breath. If they stand their ground I'll probably just zero that account and look elsewhere. I'm more than halfway to quitting altogether anyway so it's no big deal.

    I'm not back, by the way. I'm just offering Dan, who is one of the proper gents on this forum, some moral support.

    Would it be fair to say you are a serial complainer Dessie.

  10. #9
    Administrator dvds2000's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Sunderland
    Posts
    2,448
    Thanks
    444
    Thanked 466 Times in 193 Posts
    Blog Entries
    2
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    I bet fairly regularly with Betfair and have never even heard of this bonus. I notice they withdrew the free follow-up bet if backed a winner at 3/1+ some time back but don't know exactly when.

    I mentioned a similar issue I had with Betvictor some time back. They didn't give me the best odds and it turned out they had withdrawn the concession from me over a year before (which shows how infrequently I bet with them) and had informed be by email at the time. I had just forgotten. I zeroed my account and haven't bet with them since.

    Today I was in touch with William Hill because they didn't settle a winning bet yesterday at best odds. They said it was because I placed the bet on Friday evening and their BOG doesn't apply until the day of the race, a situation that has been in place since May. I make 95% of my bets via oddschecker and when I checked tomorrows betting, the BOG is ticked above the Hills logo. When I pointed this out to the operative he said it's Oddschecker's issue. I lost out twice in the race as not only did I miss out on the better price but I was also hit with a R4 due to a non-runner which came out much earlier in the day.

    I've asked for one of the managers to call me back but I won't hold my breath. If they stand their ground I'll probably just zero that account and look elsewhere. I'm more than halfway to quitting altogether anyway so it's no big deal.

    I'm not back, by the way. I'm just offering Dan, who is one of the proper gents on this forum, some moral support.
    If they ring you back, and try the 'not our problem' stance, mention to them that the ASA doesn't share that view, and recent large fines handed out for misleading advertising backs that up. The ASA and UKGC make it VERY clear that license holders are entirely responsible for their affiliates advertising, and Sky Betting and Gaming (who own oddschecker) being one of the largest affiliates in the world, are fully aware of the rules.

  11. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to dvds2000 For This Useful Post:

    Carl (4th August 2019), Desert Orchid (4th August 2019)

  12. #10
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    Appreciated, dvds2000. My issue is with Hills. Will that change things?

    We discussed not long ago a dispute I had with Bet365 over their extra places and my being denied a minor place return because I had backed the horse via oddschecker. There, it was clearly showing 5 places as well as on the oddschecker betslip but they claimed I had to bet directly via their own site and check the box 'claiming' the extra place concession in order to get it.

    I took you advice at the time and wrote to the chap you suggested. His advice was that if I have a long-standing positive and profitable relationship with B365 perhaps I should take this hit, learn from it and not rock any boats. I took the advice but I reckon the number of bets I have with them has halved since then as I now actively look to other bookies offering the same odds.
    Last edited by Desert Orchid; 4th August 2019 at 7:35 PM.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  13. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Liverpool
    Posts
    2,940
    Thanks
    403
    Thanked 240 Times in 175 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by LUKE View Post
    First off I have to say it is every punters responsibility to be aware of a bookmakers terms and conditions -I haven't had a bet with William Hill since 2002 and I know they no longer pay double result.If I was you Dan I would have another word with customer services -I find it hard to believe they would exclude you without notice -ask them for a copy of the email.
    There is another possibility -recently I was put on a 2% commission deal with betfair -the downside was no more guaranteed prices or special offers -have you signed up for something like that recently.
    Thanks for your advice, Luke. I had a similar problem with Paddy Power a few years ago and pursued it along the lines you suggest but without a satisfactory outcome. It seemed they weren`t interested in any sense of fairness or customer service. In this case, particularly in view of the amount involved, I feel life is too short to battle with such outfits.
    Incidentally, I do admire DO for having the tenacity to pursue his complaints.

  14. #12
    Senior Member simmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    South Lanarkshire
    Posts
    5,523
    Thanks
    306
    Thanked 397 Times in 357 Posts
    I don't see anything wrong with being a serial complainer if there is a series of issues to be raised!! More power to you.

  15. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    8,252
    Thanks
    264
    Thanked 317 Times in 251 Posts
    DD-when Paddy Power started in 1988 they were a reaction to what was perceived as the unfairness and at times sharp practice of the big English multiples operating in Ireland at the time.For years Powers were the ultimate in customer relations-unfortunately as they grew to a mega company they decided to squeeze more and more out of the business.My father does a 50 cent Lucky 15 with them everyday and constantly gets underpaid.
    I avoid them but there is a generation of young people in Ireland who view them as the only option for having a bet.

  16. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    8,252
    Thanks
    264
    Thanked 317 Times in 251 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by simmo View Post
    I don't see anything wrong with being a serial complainer if there is a series of issues to be raised!! More power to you.
    The problem with being a serial complainer is that eventually people view you as a crank.

  17. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    701
    Thanks
    199
    Thanked 52 Times in 44 Posts
    Even if you are using oddschecker, best not to bet directly through them. I always assumed that this alerted your bookmaker that you are somewhat sharp/price sensitive, just the sort of account they want to close.

    Sent from my SM-J415FN using Tapatalk

  18. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    7,401
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked 1,133 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    110
    Amen to this, Warbler.

    Quote Originally Posted by Warbler View Post
    It always amuses me slightly when I hear punters complaining about being stung by bookmakers and threatening to close their accounts in retaliation. The thing is, betting isn't quite the traditional consumer market where you can protest a company by withdrawing your custom. If you want to protest (and hurt) a bookmaker, you have to keep betting with them. Now in fairness Dan has stated that he has "not made much, if any profit". Fair play to him, he's admitted it, but I've seen plenty of people in cyberspace threatening to close accounts whilst claiming to be profitable. Never too sure about the consistency of the two positions myself

    I remember being done by Ladbrokes a decade or so ago and not betting with them for about a year, deciding to save up my next good bet and reserve it for them. As it transpires they gave me 20/1 about Reverence for the Nunthorpe with heavy rain forecast. It duly rained, the ground at York went heavy, Reverence won by 2L's and was returned something like 4/1. Yes, I'm sure Ladbrokes share price took a hammering that day because of me, and last time I checked they were still a successful FTSE what ever company, but I guess it's all about settling your own grievance, but bookmaking is an almost uniquely difficult industry to do it in due to the nature of the transaction and relationship between company and customer. The only way you can punish them is to beat them, unless you're a losing punter of course
    What Dan alludes to is not just a horse racing issue either.

    I had £50 on number 28 or 29 many years ago (can't quite remember which of the two it was), (maybe ten years ago now), with Hills online, (on premium roulette at 36/1).

    However, the next time I logged in the maximum stake you could place on an individual number was £15, not £50!

    Another coincidence?

    Ps, my finances and cash flow were a lot better in those years.

    I could near enough guarantee I'd land a nice pay out every several months; those days are gone now.
    Last edited by Marb; 4th August 2019 at 9:16 PM.

  19. #17
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by LUKE View Post
    DD-when Paddy Power started in 1988 they were a reaction to what was perceived as the unfairness and at times sharp practice of the big English multiples operating in Ireland at the time.For years Powers were the ultimate in customer relations-unfortunately as they grew to a mega company they decided to squeeze more and more out of the business.My father does a 50 cent Lucky 15 with them everyday and constantly gets underpaid.
    I avoid them but there is a generation of young people in Ireland who view them as the only option for having a bet.
    Happened to be in a Powers shop today to watch Galway. In the 2.45 race the winner, Mr. Smith, had got in as a reserve, however he at no point before the race was listed in the betting on any Paddy Power screen or betting odds terminal. They had a list of odds for all other horses, except him.

    Never seen anything like it before in all my years gambling - it was noticed by a few punters in the shop (I hadn't had a bet myself) who queried it with staff who said they could do nothing. So out of interest I decided to ring the retail helpdesk this evening about what happened - to be told that they'd had hundreds of calls about it but decided that they weren't voiding bets on the race.

    So essentially they've offered a market in all their shops in Ireland on which not a single shop punter could have backed the winner.
    Last edited by JJ.; 4th August 2019 at 10:32 PM.

  20. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Posts
    1,891
    Thanks
    84
    Thanked 318 Times in 204 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JJ. View Post
    Happened to be in a Powers shop today to watch Galway. In the 2.45 race the winner, Mr. Right, had got in as a reserve, however he at no point before the race was listed in the betting on any Paddy Power screen or betting odds terminal. They had a list of odds for all other horses, except him.

    Never seen anything like it before in all my years gambling - it was noticed by a few punters in the shop (I hadn't had a bet myself) who queried it with staff who said they could do nothing. So out of interest I decided to ring the retail helpdesk this evening about what happened - to be told that they'd had hundreds of calls about it but decided that they weren't voiding bets on the race.

    So essentially they've offered a market in all their shops in Ireland on which not a single shop punter could have backed the winner.
    Couldnt have backed the winner or taken a price on the winner? Sorry for being devil's advocate.

  21. #19
    Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    43
    Thanks
    52
    Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
    Take your point, and I suppose if someone had written the name of the horse on a docket they may have been paid at SP.

    But given he was a reserve, and given he didn't appear listed on their screens in the betting at any stage it seems unlikely people would have done so. Even post race they couldn't enter the result of the race for 20 minutes on their screens - they just had the 2nd, 3rd and 4th listed.

  22. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Waterford
    Posts
    8,252
    Thanks
    264
    Thanked 317 Times in 251 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by JJ. View Post
    Take your point, and I suppose if someone had written the name of the horse on a docket they may have been paid at SP.

    But given he was a reserve, and given he didn't appear listed on their screens in the betting at any stage it seems unlikely people would have done so. Even post race they couldn't enter the result of the race for 20 minutes on their screens - they just had the 2nd, 3rd and 4th listed.

    Shameful stuff -years ago they would have taken it on the chin but not these days.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •