Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Teams' Analysis

  1. #1
    Senior Member Bar the Bull's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Llandubno, West Wales (very west)
    Posts
    9,534
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts

    Teams' Analysis

    The Guardian are running with a network of articles about each of the teams from local journalists. I think they've done 6 of the 8 groups so far, and I have enjoyed the articles immensely.

    http://www.theguardian.com/football/...xperts-network

    Each team has three articles:
    • Tactical Analysis
    • Fun Facts About Some of the Players
    • In-depth Profile of One Player
    Although it takes a long time to read the articles, I would heartily recommend them. Some journalists are better than others, but the tactical analyses have all been very interesting so far.

    Has anybody read any other decent supplements? I was travelling this week, so I missed the Racing Post betting guide. Was it worth the read?
    Welsh and Proud.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Hamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,548
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    I enjoyed them as well.

  3. #3
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Nate Silver (who is a stats genius, if not in football) has produced some algorithms and written a blog:

    http://fivethirtyeight.com/interactives/world-cup/
    http://fivethirtyeight.com/features/...d-cup-to-lose/
    I'm bored of this. I'm going for a Twix.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Hamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,548
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    You need to be mad in the head to think Brazil have a 45% chance of winning the World Cup! It's like saying Australia should be 1/2 for the Arc. I would love a Betfair market with Brazil taking out 45% - it would be like Deep Impact at the Arc all over again...
    Last edited by Hamm; 10th June 2014 at 2:38 PM.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I did think that and the blog does explain some of the problems with the model (lack of data mainly) in fairness but it's sound analysis nonetheless (even if the conclusions are questionable). Certainly more scientific than the majority of the anecdotal bullshit I read in the RP pullout last week!

    He's certainly a man I wouldn't want to oppose in any betting markets (especially politics!)
    I'm bored of this. I'm going for a Twix.

  6. #6
    SlimChance
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamla Stan View Post
    I did think that and the blog does explain some of the problems with the model (lack of data mainly) in fairness but it's sound analysis nonetheless (even if the conclusions are questionable). Certainly more scientific than the majority of the anecdotal bullshit I read in the RP pullout last week!

    He's certainly a man I wouldn't want to oppose in any betting markets (especially politics!)
    I followed him in on his opinion of Obama's college votes in the last US election. I think Stan James laid me €880 @ 10/11 on their handicap which was set lower than every other firm and the spread on intrade.com. It was probably easily the biggest bet I had that year.

    Good times. How the account stayed open so long remain s a mystery.
    Last edited by SlimChance; 10th June 2014 at 4:35 PM.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Hamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,548
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamla Stan View Post

    He's certainly a man I wouldn't want to oppose in any betting markets (especially politics!)
    But he says Brazil should be significantly shorter than what they are which is plainly wrong (even the biggest Brazil support wouldn't suggest they are a 6/4 or 7/4 shot for the WC). There is simply not enough recent worthwhile data in International Football to model this kind of stuff.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Posts
    766
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Michael Cox on Zonal Marking has a good team by team analysis, I cannot get the link right for his site but his Twitter link works ok.

    https://twitter.com/Zonal_Marking

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Blackpool
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    I found courtesy of 'Fantasy Football Scout' a table of average goals for/goals against in qualifying.

    Maybe not measuring like for like, but taking the difference and then sorting (excluding Brazil of course) gave:

    Top Holland +2.9

    2nd ENGLAND +2.7

    3rd Germany +2.6.

    I'm going to find a way of weighting by continent but I was surprised by the top 3.

    MR2

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Blackpool
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    With a bit of weighting, new positions:

    Top Holland +2.9

    2nd Argentina +2.81

    3rd ENGLAND +2.7

    Not the worst forecast, the numbers might have predicted.

    MR2

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Blackpool
    Posts
    763
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    While hopefully not boring you all, used the ratings above and worked through a predictor, giving:

    Semis: Brazil vs Germany & Holland vs Argentina

    Final: Germany (F!!!!) vs Holland

    ===> Winner Holland
    ===> 3rd Place Argentina

    Interesting predictions:

    England beat Japan and then lose to Holland in the quarter-finals.
    Germany beat Russia and then Bosnia (all good historical war zones, shame Poland did'nt qualify)

    Pretty happy with my effort tonight - MR2

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,720
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 68 Times in 65 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Hamm View Post
    You need to be mad in the head to think Brazil have a 45% chance of winning the World Cup! It's like saying Australia should be 1/2 for the Arc. I would love a Betfair market with Brazil taking out 45% - it would be like Deep Impact at the Arc all over again...
    I agree

    What a load of drivel. He hasn't a clue. One duff headline figure and bin the rest

    He has Mexico as a 3% chance of beating brazil. What does he think they are ? paraplegics?

    Will he lay 33/1 then? Will he fck

    15/2 at the bookies
    Last edited by clivex; 10th June 2014 at 10:36 PM.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    As I said, he explains the flaws in the model (as Hamm says, lack of data) like any analyst/mathematician worth their salt would. It's a damn sight more interesting than the usual bullshit spouted by so called analysts and experts in the TV and print media saying how England have never beat X in the last 12 matches (even though 10 were probably before the second world war etc).

    As Slim says, he's not someone's opinion you'd want to ignore and whilst the model has clearly under estimated some teams and over estimated some teams, there is still a clear narrative, especially in predicting the groups.
    I'm bored of this. I'm going for a Twix.

  14. #14
    Senior Member Hamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,548
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    I disagree - he is someone, in this sphere, you would want to go against very much. He is trying to transfer his statistical modelling approach to the WC, which simply doesn't work, and is better ignoring completely. In other spheres such as politics where his method has more validity, I would agree with you both he is of interest.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hamm View Post
    I disagree - he is someone, in this sphere, you would want to go against very much. He is trying to transfer his statistical modelling approach to the WC, which simply doesn't work, and is better ignoring completely. In other spheres such as politics where his method has more validity, I would agree with you both he is of interest.
    He has applied it to baseball and basketball very successfully too though.

    Obviously, I'd rather have Tony Bloom's model!!
    Last edited by Gamla Stan; 11th June 2014 at 11:04 AM.
    I'm bored of this. I'm going for a Twix.

  16. #16
    Senior Member Bar the Bull's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Llandubno, West Wales (very west)
    Posts
    9,534
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
    Has he factored momentum into his model?
    Welsh and Proud.

  17. #17
    Senior Member Hamm's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    12,548
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamla Stan View Post
    He has applied it to baseball and basketball very successfully too though.

    Obviously, I'd rather have Tony Bloom's model!!
    And I'm sure that could work well - but these events recur much more frequently than the WC, and hence the recent data is relevant to predicting the current tournament. I think even the last WC could be argued as irrelevant (data wise).

  18. #18
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Hamm View Post
    And I'm sure that could work well - but these events recur much more frequently than the WC, and hence the recent data is relevant to predicting the current tournament. I think even the last WC could be argued as irrelevant (data wise).
    Agree with all of this. On a more general point, football (along with racing!) does seem to be one of the sports a long long way behind the curve on meaningful data which can be used to predict performance.

    My appetite for football has dropped off a cliff since the last World Cup but I'm trying to get back into it and I've just started reading this: http://www.amazon.co.uk/The-Numbers-.../dp/0670922242 which has got off to a good start.
    I'm bored of this. I'm going for a Twix.

  19. #19
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I'm bored of this. I'm going for a Twix.

Similar Threads

  1. European Teams?
    By harry in forum World Cup 2018
    Replies: 54
    Last Post: 11th June 2014, 12:21 PM
  2. Promoted Teams
    By harry in forum Other Sports
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 21st April 2012, 10:11 PM
  3. Lingfield Trends Analysis
    By Bruce_Savage in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 79
    Last Post: 13th December 2011, 10:35 PM
  4. Festival Novice Hurdles - Results & Analysis
    By rorydelargy in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 28th February 2010, 5:44 PM
  5. Sectional Analysis
    By EC1 in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 72
    Last Post: 5th July 2009, 6:48 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •