Page 11 of 133 FirstFirst ... 6789101112131415162161111 ... LastLast
Results 201 to 220 of 2649

Thread: TV coverage

  1. #201
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,720
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 68 Times in 65 Posts
    Mac was good for viewing figures ...almost certainly... But for the image of the sport? Dreadful in truth. His sexism was truly awful.

  2. #202
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    late 1960's early 70's
    Posts
    17,679
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked 610 Times in 393 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Desert Orchid View Post
    Yes, but should we really be appealing to the lowest common denominator?

    Shouldn't we really be aiming to raise the bar in terms of analysis, insight and, dare I say, finding winners?
    all those things are boring in the main to the people they want to attract..it might suit us within..but it appears that within the game there isn't enough of us watching on TV

  3. #203
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,890
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 137 Times in 90 Posts
    Racing is a minority sport. The constant push to try and get the general public watching it on TV is just stupid. Concentrate on getting the fans of the sport watching it then CH4 will raise figures.

  4. The Following User Says Thank You to Digger For This Useful Post:

    Colin Phillips (21st November 2015)

  5. #204
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    3,657
    Thanks
    742
    Thanked 900 Times in 590 Posts
    If racing 'insiders' want higher viewing figures they should make RUK free to air. Terrestrial TV isn't interested in paying money to broadcast racing other than as a fashion show (Royal Ascot) or as national treasures (the Derby and the National) so include them in the broadcasting 'Crown Jewels' that have to be available for terrestrial and have everything else free on atr and RUK for the people who are interested in racing rather than some irritating tw@ts fashion tips.
    The older I get the better I was.

  6. #205
    Senior Member Frankel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Posts
    4,766
    Thanks
    77
    Thanked 175 Times in 161 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Digger View Post
    In the same way having sex with the corpse of Margaret Thatcher would be entertaining.
    Whatever floats your boat
    All comers, all grounds, all beaten!

    This perfect mix of poetry and destruction.

  7. #206
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,720
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 68 Times in 65 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by archie View Post
    If racing 'insiders' want higher viewing figures they should make RUK free to air. Terrestrial TV isn't interested in paying money to broadcast racing other than as a fashion show (Royal Ascot) or as national treasures (the Derby and the National) so include them in the broadcasting 'Crown Jewels' that have to be available for terrestrial and have everything else free on atr and RUK for the people who are interested in racing rather than some irritating tw@ts fashion tips.
    100% agree. It's short sighted not to. Accountants ruling.

    The coverage would is excellent and would certainly draw in punters who pass the sport by. Many sports fans will channel hop out of habit and that's the target audience

    i would still look to keep terrestrial of course but would be a perfect showcase. Sports that need to promote themselves as a sport at a certain level do everything they can to get airtime. And racing does need to

  8. #207
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,748
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 930 Times in 580 Posts
    Absolutely spot on. RUK free is so important, particularly as they have the majority of big races. And Digger is also right. Getting people to the races is why they get interested and watch.

  9. #208
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,720
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 68 Times in 65 Posts
    Yes. I think you run a business and you know that visibility is all. I feel strongly about this

    its not necessarily this mythical new young market but re-engaging those that like the sport but have lapsed of which I know many. I'm Far from a tv addict but I'll surf sports channels on occasions. Ok nothing will convert me to f1 or wrestling, but excellent smart coverage will draw you in. I've found that Rugby can be a case in point.

    ruk has that. It's relaxed and watchable. Atr is fine but the racing is so so and the presentation is like standing in the bookies

    its crazy that they don't take a long term view on this and surely certain costs could be met by advertising which must be paltry with so few viewers at present
    Last edited by clivex; 21st November 2015 at 8:37 PM.

  10. #209
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maruco View Post
    Absolutely spot on. RUK free is so important, particularly as they have the majority of big races. And Digger is also right. Getting people to the races is why they get interested and watch.
    I don't know enough about RUK to make meaningful comment but I also agree wholeheartedly with Digger's point.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


  11. #210
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,748
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 930 Times in 580 Posts
    It's typical of the shortsighted approach from the racecourses. I accept that they are businesses and I assume that the revenues generated from ATR are significant, so I can only assume that the potential for increase in race day revenues isn't perceived as sufficient.

    I've seen the numbers somewhere way back when, but does anyone have any idea of the current contribution from RUK that the racecourses receive? Depending what the numbers are I can see a very obvious business case in my head.

    RUK going free to air would kill off the pretty poor C4 coverage and finally end the constant debate about whether it'll survive.

    Broadcasting the big meetings to all is so important for the health of the sport and in some ways I hope C4 pull it to force the hand. And on that point when does the current deal expire?

  12. #211
    Senior Member trudij's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hurry up and move!!
    Posts
    5,579
    Thanks
    1,038
    Thanked 763 Times in 407 Posts
    RUK free to air? Is this real, hope or speculation ? ( forgive me if it's mentioned somewhere above - I've obviously missed it) that would be great for people like me who can't justify the cost of it but would definitely watch if it was available...
    #YourStorm
    Mr Brightside

    All posts are based on the following:
    I know what I'm talking about/ I'm having a stab in the dark
    I'm bored/ You're an idiot and I'm poking you with sticks

  13. #212
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,748
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 930 Times in 580 Posts
    No unfortunately not Trud. Just a debate about what racing needs if it wants to pull people in.

  14. #213
    Senior Member trudij's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hurry up and move!!
    Posts
    5,579
    Thanks
    1,038
    Thanked 763 Times in 407 Posts
    Ahhh. It did seem a bit too good to be true that they'd suddenly give it away!!
    Goodness knows what the answer is for racing on the tv - it really needs another frankel or kauto/denman story or someone small to come along having bred/rescued one that turns into a superstar.... Unfortunately though, you can't order those.
    #YourStorm
    Mr Brightside

    All posts are based on the following:
    I know what I'm talking about/ I'm having a stab in the dark
    I'm bored/ You're an idiot and I'm poking you with sticks

  15. #214
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    3,657
    Thanks
    742
    Thanked 900 Times in 590 Posts
    Although they are doing their annual(?) free trial offer.
    http://www.racinguk.com/freetrial
    The older I get the better I was.

  16. #215
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    179
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
    For a specialist horse racing channel charging a subscription I find RUK very disappointing. 2 quality meetings on Friday with races well spaced out and hardly a horse sighted in the paddock or going to post all afternoon. Unfortunately that's par for the course the vast majority of the time even when they have only one meeting.

  17. #216
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,748
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 930 Times in 580 Posts
    Something else I would add. I was able to watch more UK racing free of charge when I was in Australia than I can here. None of the Australian racing channels are premium subscription channels, and Australian racing continues to pull the crowds in.

    The other thing they are good at doing in the metropolitan areas is making sure transport links are good, and also having well advertised entertainment on either at the racecourse or nearby for those that want to carry on afterwards.

    There's no point in being a racing snob and wanting everyone in the crowd to be purists. They only come back if they go in the first place. Once they come they want a good time, not just a dry experience that they don't fully understand. Frequently I hear complaints about people just coming to get drunk with no understanding. So what. If they don't overstep the mark it doesn't matter. Hopefully if they enjoy themselves they're tempted to watch on TV and go back racing.

    Also I should applaud Dan Skelton who has been writing a regular column in our local rag. I've never seen a trainer do it before in my neck of the woods. It raises his profile locally, and it has the additional benefit of providing good advertising to local courses when he has runners. I've actually been to Warwick this season simply because of his column. Outside of the two main training centres my guess is this rarely happens.
    Last edited by Maruco; 22nd November 2015 at 10:40 AM.

  18. The Following User Says Thank You to Maruco For This Useful Post:

    edgt (22nd November 2015)

  19. #217
    Senior Member trudij's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2003
    Location
    Hurry up and move!!
    Posts
    5,579
    Thanks
    1,038
    Thanked 763 Times in 407 Posts
    Totally agree with your third paragraph ( although they need to come down HARD on the fights/abusers when they occur) bums in courses is what's needed - and if you "simplify" racing to get people interested at home, then do it !!
    #YourStorm
    Mr Brightside

    All posts are based on the following:
    I know what I'm talking about/ I'm having a stab in the dark
    I'm bored/ You're an idiot and I'm poking you with sticks

  20. #218
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    North Wales
    Posts
    3,657
    Thanks
    742
    Thanked 900 Times in 590 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maruco View Post
    Something else I would add. I was able to watch more UK racing free of charge when I was in Australia than I can here. None of the Australian racing channels are premium subscription channels, and Australian racing continues to pull the crowds in.
    Based on 2 visits in the last 18 months, I'm not sure I'd totally agree with this, at least as far as Brisbane is concerned. I went to midweek meetings at Eagle Farm (one of the main city tracks) and Ipswich (out of town but still classed as metropolitan) and in both cases the attendance was similar to Lingfield or Southwell on a winter's afternoon despite entry being close to free. Sure there were 20000 at Ascot (Perth) for the Melbourne Cup day meeting but I think that attendances are very much in line with ours with the big city weekend meetings being well attended. Also, I think the Sky Racing Channel 1 is free to air but Channel 2 is part of the sports package that has to be paid for.
    The older I get the better I was.

  21. #219
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,748
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 930 Times in 580 Posts
    I agree Archie. Whichever way you look at it midweek racing is midweek racing. Ironically country racing by comparison is better attended midweek. There are generally very few midweek race meetings at the metropolitan tracks though.

    Sky Racing 1 has always covered the UK's main meetings with 2 dealing with overflow for meetings that clash with Australian evening racing. Generally they schedule so the the bigger UK meetings are on 1 where possible.

  22. #220
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    1,265
    Thanks
    9
    Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
    Archie, you are dead right. It's the same in New Zealand too.

    Just like the UK, these two countries have fallen into the trap of sitting back and just presuming, or hoping, that people turn up, rather than getting out there and marketing the sport effectively - I can't think of a more insular sport than ours.

    It needs to be pointed out to those running racing that it's not the only game in town any more, there's no forever 1953.

    The days when people had to do a bit of hard graft and learn about racing if they fancied a bet have long gone.

Similar Threads

  1. New C4 coverage
    By BennyB in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 98
    Last Post: 30th July 2013, 5:22 PM
  2. Cheltenham Coverage
    By Guest_ in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 23rd March 2010, 7:56 PM
  3. BBC Coverage
    By jairducochetfan in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 29th September 2009, 10:21 AM
  4. Bbc National Coverage
    By an capall in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 7th April 2008, 11:29 PM
  5. Rte's Racing Coverage
    By Bobbyjo in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 30th March 2008, 1:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •