Page 1 of 5 12345 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 99

Thread: New C4 coverage

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Chew Valley
    Posts
    3,373
    Thanks
    239
    Thanked 164 Times in 134 Posts

    New C4 coverage

    Was interested to watch today. I appreciate it wasn't ideal that they were all in a studio at Chelters while the action was at Muss., however I was distinctly underwhelmed.

    The touch screen is a gimmick (and seems not to work), Luck is OK but the others are pretty wooden. Mick Fitz is nowhere near as good as Francome, and whilst I don't mind Claire Balding as a rule, she is a tad patronising sometimes.

    What does everyone else think?

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Diamond Geezer's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Posts
    13,884
    Thanks
    2,576
    Thanked 4,128 Times in 2,052 Posts
    Started watching on Racing UK and suddenly remembered about C4 so recorded it on the Skybox. Will probably take a look tomorrow morning but I'm not holding my breath, the producer Carl Hicks used to produce the truly awful BBC coverage and can't imagine this will be any better. Still will give it a chance.

    I imagine it will be Racing UK and ATR in this house pretty soon though.
    "The owls are not what they seem"

  3. #3
    Senior Member granger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    Moscow Flyer Stables
    Posts
    18,886
    Thanks
    831
    Thanked 1,025 Times in 735 Posts
    Didn't see but from what I read online, it wasn't a brilliant start
    Some people say he’s the best since Arkle and that’s certainly true when you look at what he’s done

  4. #4
    Marble
    Guest
    The biggest shock in all this is that Jim McGrath still remains, he must have kissed some good arse along the years. I don't like character assassinating people, but I feel purely on performance he is worthless. He has no angle on betting events, seems to have no passion for tipping winners. It all seems a token academic exercise for him. His rudeness to Big Mac, is akin to what Balding and Persad reguarly did to Carson on the Beeb.

    He always comes across like the headmaster figure and it really gets on my tits. What gives him the right to interupt Big Mac half way through his news paper round up just to point score or be a smart arse?!! For me, having watched racing for years, Big Mac has made that fecking show what it is. People are quick to judge the man on appearance and what not, but the criticisms of Big Mac have always struck me as superficially driven.

    The reality is, whatever impression the powers that be try to give, the mugs that keep this sport going, those who frequent betting shops, are all a bit crackers really, and Big Mac epitomises this perfectly. Maybe becuase of his posture and outspokeness he's a closet racist or something and this is the real reason people can't stand him?

    The day the academics (i.e. McGrath, Balding, Persad etc) manage to bastardise racing and moreover the people with the real experience of the game such as Carson and Big Mac is the day we've been taken over by the salesman.
    Last edited by Marble; 1st January 2013 at 8:54 PM.

  5. #5
    CPGagie
    Guest
    Whatever you've got is more than I have. I'm stuck with low quality replay streams, but they serve their purpose I guess.

    I wonder if the new NBN (fiber optics) down here will allow me to access an HD cable type subscription in the future? RUK have international subscriptions on PC, but the quality is no different to the streams already accessible.

    Frustrating at times, especially big fields at Ascot etc.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Posts
    2,659
    Thanks
    20
    Thanked 123 Times in 101 Posts
    biggest shame is francome going. balding and luck are fine as presenters. other additions are a bit meh. rishi persad ffs?

    will learn more from when it does a proper race meet than today's show which was more like morning line crossed with a henderson stable tour crossed with a few races from musselburgh.

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    late 1960's early 70's
    Posts
    17,679
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked 610 Times in 393 Posts
    i think Mac has been the Hurricane Higgins of the sport tbh..he has always been the face of racing even before C4..outspoken and you never knew what you would get..then as with snooker the relatively boring people take over and ride on the back of the colourful character who actually got people watching to start with.

    it matters not what anyone here thinks of Mac or Higgins..the public in general like watching colourful characters...they initially bring interest in..not because of the sport..but because of how they approach it.

    Persad and Fitzgerald are two of the most pointless boring additions ever on any show
    Last edited by EC1; 1st January 2013 at 9:32 PM.

  8. #8
    Marble
    Guest
    Agreed, Ec1.

    You've put that across very well there. The more I think of it, the more unforgivable it is to scrap Mac, the voice of the betting ring imo.
    Last edited by Marble; 1st January 2013 at 9:41 PM.

  9. #9
    Marble
    Guest
    Although I can't stand it when after the race he always makes you feel like a twat for not backing the winner, 'they knew', 'pricewise knew' etc, but apart from that, we've lost a character havn't we.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Marble View Post
    It all seems a token academic exercise for him.
    Whilst not too bothered about whether McGrath or Big Mac are on or not, I actually think racing needs to become MORE academic to attract viewers. Other sports don't shirk from bombarding the viewer with well explained statistics and data and they don't suffer from doing so.

    I'd like more in depth analysis of sectional timing, trakus type data etc. with people like James Willoughby analysing it all.
    I'm bored of this. I'm going for a Twix.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2011
    Location
    North Cork. Home of steeple chasing
    Posts
    5,341
    Thanks
    2,209
    Thanked 1,335 Times in 801 Posts
    Blog Entries
    7
    I do like their studio location at Cheltenham; it will be a great focus for the action there.
    Clare Balding will hopefully "lighten up" on C4 as time goes by.
    Nick Luck surprisingly wrote a witty ****_pull article in RUK magazine this fall, he may be the new stand up man here.
    The screen has great potential when guys get used to working it.
    Alastair Down the greatest loss; the fact that RUK used his voice on their King George Chase promo last week might mean they are getting him on their team.
    Given the choice would folk prefer their presenters to be too OTT, too safe, too smart or too thick?
    Or is that why TV have so many presenters in the first place?
    Morning Line will be the big test for the new team. If they get that right the rest will follow, I hope.

  12. #12
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    late 1960's early 70's
    Posts
    17,679
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked 610 Times in 393 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Gamla Stan View Post

    I'd like more in depth analysis of sectional timing, trakus type data etc. with people like James Willoughby analysing it all.
    i would like that too....but i get the feeling that sectional times and what not are about as appealing to most punters as watching Jimmy Saville presented TOTP's shows from 1983.

  13. #13
    Marble
    Guest
    Gamila, guess what I'm saying is, I think the new crowd of academic media types like taking cheap shots at the likes of Carson and McCririck etc, but these old timers add something which EC1 has described very well.

    Sectional timings would be great, certainly give Jim McGrath more to base his weak form study anaylisis on anyway.

    Supposed to be a professional, I think he's an amateur.
    Last edited by Marble; 1st January 2013 at 10:56 PM.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Co. Armagh
    Posts
    5,777
    Thanks
    282
    Thanked 244 Times in 178 Posts
    The best thing about the new coverage will be the absence of Carson and McCririck, Persaud isn't great but I've no problem with any of the others.

  15. #15
    Marble
    Guest
    Those two represent grit and steel, something Persad, Balding and a few others would have to purchase off a local council imo.

    The world and channel 4's dog is obviously more interested in spineless and insular characters than those with backbone.

    The modern day implementation of liberalisation lets say....
    Last edited by Marble; 1st January 2013 at 11:23 PM.

  16. #16
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    1,890
    Thanks
    21
    Thanked 137 Times in 90 Posts
    the general public dont give a shiyite about Big Mac leaving. The man has done more harm to racing than most and will not be missed. Nobody needs a betting angle anymore. Its pointless. The price is on screen. You dont need a fat smelly erse repeating them.

    The main thing i hate about mainstream racing broadcasts is the lack of form discussion and that is what they have GC for, yet he was given no opportunity to discuss form for any of the live races. I'll be sticking to RUK.

  17. #17
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2011
    Posts
    7,311
    Thanks
    814
    Thanked 1,033 Times in 875 Posts
    I thought it worked well today, albeit probably due more to accident than design.
    Claire Balding (who knows her horseracing much better than the Persad's of this world) out in the country asking pertinent questions of a trainer who gave her enough respect to answer them properly, and 4 presenters in the studio who knew their onions enough to generate sensible discussion about the form of the horses in question.
    No McCririck self- publicising histrionics, no Thompson buffoonery, no letter-box gob with her painted on smile, no daft quiz, and little of the other frippery and nonsense that filled so much of the usual programme.
    For a while there, I thought we were back to the old BBC days, when they used to take horseracing seriously

  18. #18
    Senior Member Euronymous's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Leyland
    Posts
    18,859
    Thanks
    336
    Thanked 833 Times in 691 Posts
    The only thing that matters to me is that Racing is on the box. The rest is a bonus if it's any good.

  19. #19
    Marble
    Guest
    How do you define the thoughts of an obscure 'general public'?
    Last edited by Marble; 2nd January 2013 at 12:14 AM.

  20. #20
    Senior Member Desert Orchid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    23,659
    Thanks
    2,930
    Thanked 3,482 Times in 2,742 Posts
    Was out visiting yesterday and didn't see any of it. Reading the earlier comments, I had the impression McCririck was involved but latterly not.

    McCririck is the worst thing to ever happen to racing. Only C4 ever gave this buffoon air time until the other channels jumped on the controversy bandwagon and shame on them for doing so. He was sacked years ago from a succession of jobs because he is a buffoon. He admits he failed as a bookie so his knowledge about betting must be questionable. He is a self-aggrandising moron whose extreme political views have no place on a sports programme.

    Would any other presenter or commentator in any sport ever be allowed to express such political views? Can you imagine the outcry if they did?

    C4 gave this clown his public platform and have a lot to answer for. But they were the 'quirky' channel when they started and he fitted the part at the time.

    Racing needs a programme with gravitas, not gimmicks.
    Last edited by Desert Orchid; 2nd January 2013 at 4:44 AM.
    Illegitimi non carborundum


Similar Threads

  1. TV coverage
    By Desert Orchid in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 2648
    Last Post: 25th March 2024, 12:24 AM
  2. Cheltenham Coverage
    By Guest_ in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 107
    Last Post: 23rd March 2010, 7:56 PM
  3. BBC Coverage
    By jairducochetfan in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 82
    Last Post: 29th September 2009, 10:21 AM
  4. Bbc National Coverage
    By an capall in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 7th April 2008, 11:29 PM
  5. Rte's Racing Coverage
    By Bobbyjo in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 32
    Last Post: 30th March 2008, 1:33 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •