Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Dutch view of Srebrenica

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    648
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts

    Dutch view of Srebrenica

    A court in the Netherlands has ruled the Dutch state was responsible for the deaths of three Bosniaks (Bosnian Muslims) during the 1995 Srebrenica massacre in Bosnia.

    The Dutch were in charge of the UN "safe area" in July 1995 when Bosnian Serb forces overran it and killed 8,000 Bosnian Muslim men and boys.

    The Dutch government has always said its troops were abandoned by the UN.

    The ruling was unexpected, and may open the way for other compensation claims.

    "The court ruled that the Dutch state is responsible for the death of these men because Dutchbat [Dutch UN troops] should not have handed them over," a spokeswoman for the court in The Hague said.

    See the rest at
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-14026218

  2. #2
    Senior Member krizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahn sarf
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    When your country's military participates in a UN exercise, whose responsibility is it to ensure the appropriate amount of response in terms of manpower and weaponry - yours, or the UN's? If it's yours, then the Dutch must take full responsibility for the outcome of their action, good or bad. If it's the UN's, then surely the case is against that body, not the Dutch?

    It sounds just like the dreadful Rwandan massacres, where the UN forces failed to protect enough people from tribal atrocities happening right under their noses. They were no better in the Belgian Congo at the time of its independence and the assassination of electee Patrice Lumumba, among other savageries.

    Is it time to rethink the remit of the UN, if all it does is stand by helplessly, always bleating about not having enough men or materiel, when serious and protracted brutalities break out?
    Last edited by krizon; 5th July 2011 at 4:18 PM.
    Power is good. Control is better. (Lenin)

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    648
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Well, it's not that easy, but in terms of 'honour', I'm thinking the Dutch let themselves down and badly so.
    They had a fair idea of the probable fate of their charges; not nice to put yourself in the firing line, of course.
    If they'd used their heads, they'd have known the bad guys wouldn't have shot them up ... 'a poor show' says the least.

  4. #4
    Senior Member krizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahn sarf
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    I think you mean that they would have known they'd be shot (if they used their heads), don't you?
    Power is good. Control is better. (Lenin)

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    648
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Nope.

  6. #6
    Senior Member krizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahn sarf
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Okay... so your post says that if the Dutch had thought about it, they would have known that the bad guys (your phrase) would not have shot the three Bosniaks. But they handed them over to what you call bad guys, and they were shot. I honestly don't understand what you're trying to say, SS.
    Power is good. Control is better. (Lenin)

  7. #7
    Senior Member simmo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    South Lanarkshire
    Posts
    5,523
    Thanks
    306
    Thanked 397 Times in 357 Posts
    They were handed over, presumably on the basis of the Dutch not getting "shot up". I believe that Soary Stars is suggesting that no such thing would have occurred regardless of whether they had handed them over or not.

    I would disagree with that view and sympathise both with those whose lives were taken, but also with those who are being made scapegoats - they, after all, didn't do the shooting.

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2011
    Posts
    648
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Simmo's correction to my ill-phrased post is correct.
    Had the Dutch reasoned correctly, they would have come to the conclusion they could have refused to hand over those in their protection because Mladic's men would not have attacked the Dutch.

    That they didn't (refuse) shows they really weren't led by men who belonged in the Dutch Army - for some very obvious reasons.

  9. #9
    Senior Member krizon's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dahn sarf
    Posts
    16,263
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Right, got that now, danke.
    Power is good. Control is better. (Lenin)

Similar Threads

  1. World Cup Dutch
    By Tanlic in forum World Cup 2018
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 1st July 2014, 10:52 AM
  2. Points Of View
    By Aldaniti in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 26th August 2010, 1:00 AM
  3. Dodgy Dutch
    By Flame in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 19th July 2009, 10:27 PM
  4. Belgian Beer (and French, Dutch and German too)
    By betsmate in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 31st August 2008, 11:43 AM
  5. Do We Have A Dutch Speaker On Here?
    By Songsheet in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 19
    Last Post: 28th May 2007, 1:51 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •