Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 20 of 36

Thread: Why did Ascot add water?

  1. #1
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    late 1960's early 70's
    Posts
    17,679
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked 610 Times in 393 Posts

    Why did Ascot add water?

    quite a strange decision to water yesterday seeing as the going was only near top side of Good ..or Good changing Good/firm if being picky...on times on Friday ...surely if they must water it should be to prevent really fast ground.

    It would only have been middle of Good/Firm if they had left it alone...surely thats not to hard is it?

    Instead they have created false ground which probably does more harm than genuine Good/Firm

    Will we ever see proper Good/Firm at Ascot ever again?...they seem to have a big problem there since the changes..the straight dries out far quicker than the round..more so than other tracks it appears. Most tracks have this ..round slower than straight bias... but not to the degree it is there.

  2. #2
    Senior Member Isinglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Ridgeway
    Posts
    1,339
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Yes, weird. Ascot has had ground problems on the flat for as long as I can remember, nothing seems to change that.

    Did you see Hughie Morrison having a big row with them ? Would have been funny had it not been because it ruined the chances of two of his very fancied horses.
    Speak your mind, but ride a fast horse. ~ Anon

  3. #3
    Senior Member Harbinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    11,282
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    What was Morrison's quote? Something like "typical Ascot ground... Good, Soft, Good To Firm in places".

  4. #4
    Senior Member Isinglass's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Location
    The Ridgeway
    Posts
    1,339
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    He is right!
    Speak your mind, but ride a fast horse. ~ Anon

  5. #5
    Senior Member Gamla Stan's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Posts
    4,337
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Gareth Flynn View Post
    What was Morrison's quote? Something like "typical Ascot ground... Good, Soft, Good To Firm in places".
    Hilarious, good on him for standing up to them. Not enough trainers do it and at least 3 or 4 racecourses a week give shockingly incorrect going descriptions.

    His attack on Haydock was my favourite and incredibly justified.

  6. #6
    Kathy
    Guest
    I think the clerk of the course, Chris Stikels should start looking for another job. Not overly popular by all accounts.

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    14,178
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
    A complete an utter joke….why on earth did he even consider watering considering the recent weather and the forecast heavy fog and dew each morning. Watering to prevent FIRM going is just about acceptable…anything else is a no no.

  8. #8
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,720
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 68 Times in 65 Posts
    The one horse to have benefited from that would have been the french one. Didnt quite happen did it?

    Whats EC's ratings for the ground?

  9. #9
    Senior Member Powerscourt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    765
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    Amazing to see the horses run so far out from the rail in places. Surely an embarrasing situation for whoever is responsible for watering. You would think they would be able to get this watering figured out by now.
    2212-6113-12521D3304-5421 Stud

    Like many of the very best ten-furlong horses, Powerscourt has that ability to quicken. He's a very tough and genuine horse and was a joy to train."—Aidan O'Brien


  10. #10
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,103
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Clerks all over the country seem to have become paranoid since that dreadful Festival meeting where we lost 9 on fast ground after a winter of soft ground.

    Too far the other way now and genuine good/fast ground horses don't seem to be getting their chances - even in summer jumping, which is supposed to cater for them.

  11. #11
    Super Moderator Irish Stamp's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Location
    Brighton
    Posts
    8,583
    Thanks
    5
    Thanked 389 Times in 162 Posts
    Wouldn´t be the first time a course watered to aid a horse. Haydock did it for Diktat in the Sprint Cup (it worked, he turned up and won).
    Hurricane Fly - whatever he runs in he wins

    Twitter: @Quevega

  12. #12
    Senior Member Shadow Leader's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    9,884
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    They're all doing it.

    Over-watering of tracks and over racing on tracks is exactly what is producing the poor ground we often have. Grass cover is often poor too down to the sheer amounts of racing hammering the ground, and the over-watering is decimating grass quality and leading not only to patches of false ground and uneven going, but adding to the list of abandoned meetings through waterlogging.

    It's about time some sort of regulations were brought in concerning clerks of courses' addictions to hosepipes.
    Moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess.

    False face must hide what the false heart doth know.

  13. #13
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    late 1960's early 70's
    Posts
    17,679
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked 610 Times in 393 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by clivex View Post
    The one horse to have benefited from that would have been the french one. Didnt quite happen did it?

    Whats EC's ratings for the ground?
    Clive

    On Friday probably the best race to look at re the going was the race won by Laddies Poker Two

    that was run in 73.1..which makes the race 2.1 seconds per mile faster than the middle of Good ground on my time calcs...which is about 1.2 seconds per mile into true G/F ground.

    If you want to cross check that using the RP standard..it was 0.7sec faster than their standard..which I believe is for a mature OHR 100 horse carrying 9-0 on true Good going.......the winners is about a 91-94 horse and carried 5lb less..and is not quite fully mature...so has probably run 1.7 seconds faster than Good in their opinion..which is very similar to my 2.1 seconds per mile figure.

    that isn't even close to Firm ground..that would only start about 2.8 seconds per mile fast ,,,which means that with overnight moisture to counteract any drying on Saturday...they could have totally refrained from watering and still had SAFE Good/Firm going that was never going to verge into Firm at all.

  14. #14
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2006
    Posts
    12,720
    Thanks
    48
    Thanked 68 Times in 65 Posts
    Never thought the day would happen when i asked for your ratings EC lol


    But like so many others, I am getting cheesed off with dodgy going descriptions and pointless watering. Good stuff. Something that should be analysed and disected more by the racing press IMO

  15. #15
    Banned
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    late 1960's early 70's
    Posts
    17,679
    Thanks
    207
    Thanked 610 Times in 393 Posts
    aye

    there was a certain irony there Clive

    to be fair..it's not difficult for these people to do these calculations...if I can do them in me front room in about 10 minutes...surely they can do the same and actually start running racecourses with at least some common sense involved.

    To water for Saturday was surely the sign of an incompetent who would be shown the door in any other job

    every season now we have this..it must be a nightmare for trainers and owners that have horses that want geniune good/firm ground....most of our races in future will only be run on loose topped ground by the looks of it

    as mentioned in this thread as well..the damage that watering does is ridiculous..great lumps of sodden turf kicked off of dry undersoil must be trashing the surfaces beyond belief.

    we talk about this regularly on here ...and other racing forums also talk lots about it...but no one seems bothered from within the racing world..surely someone with some clout can bend some ears.

  16. #16
    Super Moderator
    Join Date
    Apr 2006
    Posts
    5,377
    Thanks
    10
    Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
    Ground looked very loose on top on Sunday especially. What a mess.

  17. #17
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,748
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 930 Times in 580 Posts
    I'm one of the firrst to object to inaccurate going descriptions. It's not something that's particularly difficult to get right, and the fundamental reason it's inaccurate is so courses don't have swaythes of non-runners. They still work fromm the basis that if the horsebox turns up the horse will run. Unfortuntely trainers and owners work on the same basis which perpetuates the problem.

    Of course the answer is simple. An accurate reading should be taken with 90 minutes of the first race, but until racecourses are forced to do this we will have to continue to guess. Quite staggering considering it wouldn't take an industrial revelution to sort it out.

    Some facts and perspective regarding Ascot are important though. The drainage there has played havoc in the straight. Not only has it created a draw bias which they can only correct through differential watering either side of the straight finish, drainage around the rest of the course is also massively different. The finishing straight compared to Swinley Bottom when they have rain can be several going descriptions different, with the rest of the course some variation in between. Given these facts artificial watering is essential. Chris Stickels is taking plenty of flack , but I would suggest he has the most challenging ground managing and maintenance job in the UK right now.

  18. #18
    Senior Member Harbinger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2004
    Posts
    11,282
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
    But that's the drainage that they put in there themselves during the rebuild, right?

  19. #19
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,493
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
    Tom Segal has been having a pop at Ascot as an impossible course to win on ever since it re-opened now for some time..... well ever since it re-opened as it happened. Urm....... might have phrased that better. Leaving that aside, it's been my most successful course since.

    Learn how to calculate your own going corrections in running folks Admittedly it means swerving the opening affairs, but with the possible exception of Longchamp and the Curragh at a stretch, I can't think there's a course that more routinely puts out as much misleading going descriptions. I personally don't mind it, so long as they're racing there the next day, as it's one of the few places I think I can get a bit of an edge.

    And as Maruco is only interested in a horse that jumps over an obstacle, he will be equally aware that one of the biggest offenders (any top 5 list) is his own Mecca
    Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly. _ Harry Limes

  20. #20
    Gone But Not Forgotten
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    2,103
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Shadow Leader View Post
    Over-watering of tracks and over racing on tracks is exactly what is producing the poor ground we often have. Grass cover is often poor too down to the sheer amounts of racing hammering the ground, and the over-watering is decimating grass quality and leading not only to patches of false ground and uneven going, but adding to the list of abandoned meetings through waterlogging.
    Shadow - would the deteriorating quality of the ground be the cause of the trend I've noticed this season for hurdling times being so much slower (in seconds per furlong) than chase times, even on ground given as good to firm?

    Or would it be the way the different races are being ridden?

    (I keep speed ratings and have not seen anything like the differences in going calculations between chase and hurdle tracks as have occurred this year.)

Similar Threads

  1. Not looking good across the water
    By Flame in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 639
    Last Post: 26th March 2021, 10:10 AM
  2. Microwaving water
    By redhead in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 11th August 2010, 3:45 PM
  3. Water Jumps
    By Cantoris in forum General Racing Topics
    Replies: 18
    Last Post: 31st March 2008, 8:24 PM
  4. Humphrys In Hot Water.
    By Tout Seul in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 5th September 2005, 1:51 PM
  5. Water, Water, Everywhere...
    By krizon in forum Chit Chat
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 2nd September 2005, 8:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •