Simply amazed the placing has been revised.
Dreadful decision, the winner won on merit and if being owned by a bigger owner would not have been disqualified.
Simply amazed the placing has been revised.
Dreadful decision, the winner won on merit and if being owned by a bigger owner would not have been disqualified.
Hope that doesn't make the difference in the jockey's title.
It was a very short head and the horse was at least lent on...........and Seb kept the whip in the wrong hand.
Is PM Racing a bigger owner than Joseph Joyce?? shrug::
Have the stewards had a bet on Jamie for the Championship?.............might be a more pertinent question. h34r:
Ah! but a man's reach should exceed his grasp......
Poor piece of riding from Sanders, he deserves a suspension for that.
Dante, your talking out your arse
I'm sure Seb will appeal against that result and get it re-instated.
I backed Black Rain so I'm quite happy by the result being changed. But it shouldn't have been.
I thought Mr. Spencer was rather "careless" on his second winner.
His horse hanging left didn't do Ryan Moore's horse much good.
Ah! but a man's reach should exceed his grasp......
agree slightly Colin but the 4th horse actually interfered with Ryan's not Jamie's and at least Jamie had his stick in the correct hand and never picked his stick up, just hands and heels trying to steer it.
Were you on the back seat of a bus when you typed that chris ?
I could be the judge!
I don't know half of you half as well as I should like, and I like less than half of you half as well as you deserve.
That Chriss post could have been signed by me.
Was actually typing and talking on the phone whilst trying to place a bet online all at the same time, and thats what i write like without a spell checker.Originally posted by uncle goober@Nov 2 2007, 02:23 PM
Were you on the back seat of a bus when you typed that chris ?
He was lucky he got away with accidental rather than careless but chris as you are so confident, are you prepared to put your money where your mouth is and lay me evens the result isn't changed? I thought not :laughing:Originally posted by chrisbeekracing@Nov 2 2007, 03:04 PM
Dante, your talking out your arse
I'm sure Seb will appeal against that result and get it re-instated.
I backed Black Rain so I'm quite happy by the result being changed. But it shouldn't have been.
Always happy to take a bet but don't know if they have appealed yet, if they appeal i will happily lay u evens about Seb not getting the win back, Ive seen much worse not changed. It was reminiscent of the Bath incident for Buick which in the end got re-reversed. I swear sometimes you just watch things through Spencer goggles.
Evens all in is a very good price for you if you think it is a 5's on chance, why would they not appeal if it is as clear cut as you say?
In England, I agree.Originally posted by chrisbeekracing@Nov 2 2007, 03:45 PM
Ive seen much worse not changed.
Dylan Thomas kept the Arc doing much more and with french stewards!!!!!
Certain owners and trainers may not appeal, thats racing.Originally posted by Dante@Nov 2 2007, 03:00 PM
Evens all in is a very good price for you if you think it is a 5's on chance, why would they not appeal if it is as clear cut as you say?
Ive seen many results changed and connections appeal for no reason and vice versa.
If he appeals the result would get changed.
Seb made no manouver, Spencer never had to stop riding and the the horse never lost any ground.
Quite why it was changed baffled me. I always think if you watch a race side on and cant see why there is a stewards it shouldn't change. I don't think anyone watching the race live saw any reason for a Stewards.
Seb needing every winner for the championship would be a good enough reason I would have thought, Makin said he would appeal straight after the race but whether he see's sense and revises that is anyones guess.
Can i ask you an honest question to which i would expect an honest answer?
If the jockeys were on the other horses and Seb got the race for such minute interference would you be spitting your dummy out saying they should have never changed the result?
I know the reason why the result was amended. If you ask me nicely, I'll tell you*.
(* one or two members will already know what I'm talking about)
handsome is as handsome does
Well go on then, I'll ask nicely!
Pretty please, Rory, could you kindly tell us why the placings were reversed?
Chris to Dante: << I swear sometimes you just watch things through Spencer goggles. >>
Oh, ROFL - you are a wag :clap: