Agree everything you’ve said there. Especially the inside part it’s a gravy train if you’re the right side of it. The fact racing has so many families that are interlinked probably sums it all up...
Type: Posts; User: SP Only
Agree everything you’ve said there. Especially the inside part it’s a gravy train if you’re the right side of it. The fact racing has so many families that are interlinked probably sums it all up...
Aren’t wind ops meant to be declared now? I agree it’s no good after the race but let’s be honest if you’re planning on smashing one off the boards then you’re not going to advertise it on some ****...
I personally don’t believe they should. The time for interviews is post race for both winning and losing rides. The betting public are much more entitled I’d say to an explanation for his ride today...
Again apples and pears but for the sake of argument.
A. I don’t believe he should. He is paid for them by the sponsors of them who are usually bookmakers. Even if it isn’t bookmakers he is...
No one said he was throwing races. You’re missing the point content or no content he has the biggest impact on the horse in any race he may have commented on. It isn’t rocket science it’s a huge...
There are rules and regulations around that and it is regulated by the FCA who are monitoring so there is a big difference. Also the analyst can talk a stock up but can’t directly affect the end...
It’s madness in no other industry could you get away with such conflicts of interests. Comes down to the who regulates the regulators question as clearly the authorities allow this practice to go on.