Page 20 of 20 FirstFirst ... 10151617181920
Results 381 to 399 of 399

Thread: UK election

  1. #381
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    477
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 69 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grasshopper View Post

    the expectations of a population evolve, and to deliver against those expectations requires the economy to grow. If the economy doesn't grow, you have stagnation, and the expectations cannot be met
    The Great God Growth

    Can economies continue growing for ever - and therefore continue to exact an ever-growing demand on the world's resources - or does there come a point where a mature and advanced economy fulfills the full expectations of its consumers and renders any further growth unnecessary as 'peak comfort' has been reached?

    In my opinion the stable capitalist western democracies have now reached that point; the problem being that the wealth accrued by them over so many decades has not been distributed fairly amongst the populace: the rich have got richer and the poor have got poorer, thanks to the slavish belief in the neo-liberal economic dogma of Hayek

    Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure nineteen [pounds] nineteen [shillings] and six [pence], result happiness. Annual income twenty pounds, annual expenditure twenty pounds ought and six, result misery


    So I'm certainly not countenacing recession. Nope: the three factors that just might save the Capitalist Empire from going the way of the Egyptian, Greek, Inca, Aztec, Roman...Empires are:

    Slight Growth
    Slight Inflation
    Slight increase in population

    How to quantify "slight"?

    I dunno, how about 0.25% per annum? Strong and Stable

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Drone For This Useful Post:

    Grasshopper (17th November 2017), Marb (16th November 2017)

  3. #382
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    7,401
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked 1,133 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    110
    Quote Originally Posted by Drone View Post
    The Great God Growth

    Can economies continue growing for ever -
    It has to be worth a try, Drone.

    I say it again, the ageing population, etc.

    The U.K will need growth in future years, for population necessities in decades' time; not just so we can scoff more Ferrero Rochers' and all subscribe to Sky TV.

    Your points are noble ones, for sure, but aiming for "slight" growth, leaves the strong possibility, you'll get none at all, imho.
    Last edited by Marb; 16th November 2017 at 8:12 PM.

  4. #383
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,493
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grasshopper View Post
    This May administration is the most incompetent, selfish, aloof, undemocratic and (verging on) corrupt Government I have known in my lifetime. It's as if the last election never happened, and a completely different question was asked in the EU Referendum. No-one voted for a hard-Brexit, and to make it absolutely clear that it was the case, we denied May her precious majority; an absolutely resounding message from the public that the her policies were rejected. Yet they plough-on regardless, with their extreme approach. This Government claims we will have our sovereignty returned in one breath, whilst completely ignoring the will of the people in the next.

    If it was down to me, we'd be going back hundreds of years in the statute-book, to find an archaic law that allows us to round-up the lot of them, and throw their scrawny-arses in the fu*cking clink.
    There seems to have been an audible increase in messaging in the last fortnight which suggests that the Russians did it (neatly overlooking the corrosive drip feed contributions made over decades by the conservative media and a couple of party leaders). I do wonder if they're preparing a face saving retreat?

    Dear SIS, please write me a report/ letter (you know like you did for that Mr Zinoviev) that explicitly spells out that the poor innocent voters of the UK were put away by ruthless Russians, and allow me to put the whole thing into a holding position whilst we consider the dreadful implications of conclusions before reluctantly agreeing that the vote might be null and void and need doing again. Before we can do it again however, we must put in place a lengthy list of counter measures by way of precaution which we've agreed to ask a commission to consult and report on
    Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly. _ Harry Limes

  5. #384
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    7,401
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked 1,133 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    110
    Quote Originally Posted by Marble View Post
    His reporter friend on ITV just happy to tow the line for him. After we pay the E.U ******** billions the deficit levels should be back to that of pre-2010, at which point, everything will still be, fine, folks
    Nearly 8 years after austerity, they give 40 billion to E.U. All those hospitals underfunded, kids with no lunches, poor people topping themselves, all to control migrants, with 40 billions. Madness.

  6. #385
    Senior Member an capall's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Dalkey
    Posts
    5,496
    Thanks
    422
    Thanked 840 Times in 477 Posts
    Blog Entries
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by Marble View Post
    Nearly 8 years after austerity, they give 40 billion of the 60 billion they owe to the to E.U. Welshers.
    "And still they gazed and still the wonder grew. That one small head could carry all he knew.

    And that small head knew that Impaire Et Passe would win the Champion Hurdle."

  7. #386
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    477
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 69 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Drone View Post
    The Great God Growth
    Further to my ramblings above, here's an article from one of the Guardian's better hacks (damning with faint praise), George Monbiot. Don't agree with all of it, but worth a read

    https://www.theguardian.com/commenti...-planet-growth

  8. #387
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    7,401
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked 1,133 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    110
    "Those who justify this system insist that economic growth is essential for the relief of poverty." - George Monibot

    Marble's verdict as follows......

    Growth will be Essential for public service-provision in years to come, including The NHS, especially after the Tories drain the economy, pay 40 billion to The E.U to stop migrants, and preside over a bigger deficit.

    I'm sure George's Monbot's kiddies will have the cash to pay 26K a year to put him in an old people's home when he gets older, but most of his Guardian readers won't, and nor will I!
    Last edited by Marb; 22nd November 2017 at 11:03 PM.

  9. #388
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    9,294
    Thanks
    267
    Thanked 2,018 Times in 1,180 Posts
    We need a different system, rooted*not in economic abstractions but*in physical realities, that establish*the parameters by which we judge*its health. We need to build a world in which growth is unnecessary, a*world of private sufficiency and public*luxury. And we must do it before*catastrophe forces our hand..

    I like this sentence..

  10. #389
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    477
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 69 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Marble View Post
    I'm sure George's Monbot's kiddies will have the cash to pay 26K a year to put him in an old people's home when he gets older, but most of his Guardian readers won't, and nor will I!
    Most Guardian readers are comfortably-off champagne socialists suffering from a particularly chronic form of middle-class angst: do as I say, not as I do

    My old folks home will be a quiet corner in the Victoria Family & Commercial, Leeds. When I keel over chuck me out with the empties

  11. #390
    Senior Member Grasshopper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2006
    Posts
    16,018
    Thanks
    1,467
    Thanked 1,553 Times in 1,112 Posts
    Blog Entries
    3
    This Government are a joke, and May is almost-certainy the worst PM in the country’s history. How can they call this a Budget for jobs, when the very act of Brexit will see thousands of jobs vanish; either because the role has been transferred to the EU, or because of people being laid-off when the economy inevitably tanks.

    I might add we also have possibly the worst opposition in our history too. How this Corbyn-led Labour Party can vote with the Government on Brexit legislation actually beggars belief.

    The cliff-edge is approaching fast, and we’ll get there before March 2019. We will cross an invisible-line before the actual Brexit date, when the EU have made too much investment in Brexit of their own, for them to want it to be repealed, and with agencies already moving to the continent, that process has well and truly started.

    We are allowing the current political-class - save for some honourable exceptions - to sleepwalk us into an absolute disaster.
    Last edited by Grasshopper; 23rd November 2017 at 8:15 PM.
    "Beat the price and lose. It's what we do".

    SlimChance, March 2018

  12. #391
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    7,401
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked 1,133 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    110

  13. #392
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,493
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Grasshopper View Post
    This Government are a joke, and May is almost-certainy the worst PM in the country’s history.
    David Cameron would like a word with you

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk...-a7358171.html
    Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly. _ Harry Limes

  14. #393
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    7,401
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked 1,133 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    110
    Cameron put himself in the right place at the right time, powering ahead when New Labour were running out of steam after 10+ years in government.

    He'll be remembered by many as the cruellest PM, who created an even more brutal capitalist system, at a time when one was just ending with the 2008 financial crisis.

    As for Corbyn, I give him more credit than some on here. He's played it smart, and now to the public, the E.U is seen as a Tory problem, when for the early part of the 21st century it was actually seen (and probably was) a New Labour love-in.
    Last edited by Marb; 24th November 2017 at 10:58 PM.

  15. #394
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,493
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
    Cameron was the architect of so many of his own problems through his own poor judgement.

    This is why I believe he's the worst PM in my living memory.
    Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly. _ Harry Limes

  16. #395
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2016
    Posts
    7,401
    Thanks
    1,350
    Thanked 1,133 Times in 1,015 Posts
    Blog Entries
    110
    Fair point.

    You've got bags more knowledge than me Warbs as your older and wiser, I'm not exactly in a position to give a good rundown of best/worst prime ministers.

    My instinctual feeling is that the worst prime minister is someone that does something(s) so damaging to the nation that this rendors' them the 'worst'. The thing that springs to mind, in terms of foreign policy, is that man again, (sorry) Tony Blair.

    But in terms of statesman abilities, charisma, and at least trying to form his own political calculus he was probably quite decent.

    My mum was a cleaner lady for Blairs secretary in the 90's, she was at a tea party once, I remember she came back home and said he was a nice bloke, very charismatic etc.

    Then he got in power and shite happens as the saying goes!!!!

    The thing with Cameron, is he will always fall back and say every decision he made was because of Labour and the financial crisis, etc.

    Or if he had any sense he would........

    Libya was a bad decision, for the record I wasn't in favour ousting Gaddafi as the gut was telling me it was a bad idea, although I thought Syria was such an awful situation we should have done something, I was probably wrong, but rest assured, I had the right motives.
    Last edited by Marb; 25th November 2017 at 12:31 AM.

  17. #396
    Moderator
    Join Date
    Jan 2004
    Location
    The Shire
    Posts
    4,749
    Thanks
    262
    Thanked 930 Times in 580 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Marble View Post
    Fair point.

    You've got bags more knowledge than me Warbs as your older and wiser, I'm not exactly in a position to give a good rundown of best/worst prime ministers.
    You're right Martin, Warbler goes back to Gladstone days.

  18. #397
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,493
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Maruco View Post
    You're right Martin, Warbler goes back to Gladstone days.
    Gutter snipes like me were excluded in Gladstone's days, just aristocrats like you I seem to recall. I was still campaigning for to get the third reform extended. In any case, I couldn't read back then so never knew what was happening until the advent of public libraries
    Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly. _ Harry Limes

  19. #398
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    8,493
    Thanks
    11
    Thanked 103 Times in 90 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Marble View Post
    Libya was a bad decision, for the record I wasn't in favour ousting Gaddafi as the gut was telling me it was a bad idea, although I thought Syria was such an awful situation we should have done something, I was probably wrong, but rest assured, I had the right motives.


    I think you could argue that Cameron's foreign policy was even more short-sighted precisely because he had the benefit of being able to look at Iraq. Ultimately Blair's involvement didn't really make any difference. Bush had thanked him already for his support but explained that if he wasn't able to win parliament over (second UN vote) then America would proceed without him anyway. Blair was never the architect of Iraq, but a willing a accomplice. Cameron, and Sarkozy were very much the architects of Libya however, and had to recruit Hillary Clinton and Susan Rice to their cause in order to tip a less than convinced Obama into opening the door for them.

    On March 18th, 2011, Cameron gave a parliamentary statement where he moved the case for war and regime change (lets call it what it was). This quote is from his summing up when building his case and explaining his reasons

    "We simply can not have a situation where a failed pariah state festers on Europe's southern border. This would potentially threaten our security, push people across the Mediterranean and create a more dangerous and uncertain world for Britain and for all our allies as well as for the people of Libya."


    I'd be interested to know which part of this he doesn't feel he ended up achieving?

    If you want an example of just how muddle headed Cameron, then Syria is another good example. On 30th August 2013, he lost a vote in the commons to replicate his Libyan disaster in Syria when the totally hapless William Hague tried to build a case for intervention around his own opinion and hunch. You will recall that Cameron wanted to bomb Assad and the SAA, (one of the few fighting forces that were resisting the advance of ISIS). Just to illustrate how disorientated and poor a judge Cameron was, he would come back to the house in December 2015 with another proposal to bomb the other side. That's quite an achievement. It took him about four years to recognise that ISIS were the bad guys here, and even then he was still putting his faith in the FSA (a fighting entity that had largely failed to exist for the 12 months previous) and various rebel group (many of whom had actually joined, or sold their weapons to the Islamists). It perhaps needs to be remembered also that Cameron only decided to commit to this action about 3-4 months after the Russians intervened and began hitting rebel groups and ISIS. He spent months denouncing Russia, and then did the same (see Aleppo and Mosul for other examples)

    I actually regard Cameron's decision making as worse than Blair's
    Last edited by Warbler; 25th November 2017 at 11:18 AM.
    Don't be so gloomy. After all it's not that awful. Like the fella says, in Italy for 30 years under the Borgias they had warfare, terror, murder, and bloodshed, but they produced Michelangelo, Leonardo da Vinci, and the Renaissance. In Switzerland they had brotherly love - they had 500 years of democracy and peace, and what did that produce? The cuckoo clock. So long Holly. _ Harry Limes

  20. #399
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Posts
    477
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 69 Times in 49 Posts
    Quote Originally Posted by Marble View Post
    He'll be remembered by many as the cruellest PM, who created an even more brutal capitalist system, at a time when one was just ending with the 2008 financial crisis.
    Brown and Darling "saved the (unfettered capitalist) world", apparently; Cameron and his counterparts around the world just continued to nurse it through convalescence and rehab, though the patient is little improved and appears to be terminally ill

    This attempted resuscitation of a very sick man seemed to be viewed as the correct and expected procedure

    Treat the cancerous lungs of a 40-a-day smoker and then let him resume his habit

    One or two distant voices in the wilderness were heard to whisper 'You'd have thought he'd have learnt a hard lesson and given it up' cough! splutter!

    Off at a tangent:

    If Brexit materializes and if democracy is restored in Zimbabwe - both 24-point Bold Arial Black ifs then it strikes me that there would be trading opportunites galore for us and them in the brave new world. Zimbabwe has a young, well-educated population and a wealth of resources that are crying out for foreign investment. Don't um-and-ah sluggish Britain, get in there

    Long thought that the UK should set its sights on bumping-up trade with the dear old Commonwealth following Brexit, particularly the relatively impoverished members in Africa and the Caribbean. Most are 'bread baskets' constrained by lack of funds
    Last edited by Drone; 25th November 2017 at 12:31 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •